Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette




Senator Brown points at the elephant; Beacon Hill Ds dodge

by: CriticalDan

Tue May 17, 2011 at 16:18:33 PM EDT


This weekend during a commencement address at Lasell College, Senator Scott Brown had the temerity (the nerve! the absolute GALL!) to voice the obvious fact that Beacon Hill under monolithic Democratic rule is suffused with a "go along to get along" attitude that has created a "culture of corruption" in state government.



The Democrats' reaction was fun to watch.  From the Herald: "'This is a guy who's starting to see - with his recent missteps - the  erosion of his invulnerability as a candidate. That's what this is  about,' said Democratic strategist Michael Goldman."  Okay...

Or... maybe it's about the huge hole blown in Beacon Hill's cesspool by the ongoing Sal DiMasi trial, through which vast quantities of political sludge and slag are flowing into the street for all to see and smell?

CriticalDan :: Senator Brown points at the elephant; Beacon Hill Ds dodge
"I don't think corruption is a partisan issue. It's very bipartisan ...  despite what the senator says," opined former Democratic State Committee Chair Phil Johnston.  And he's right!  In most places and times, political corruption is very much a bipartisan phenomenon.  It tends to arise along with the disproportionate aggregation of power in a single, insular faction.  It just so happens that in this time and place, total political power is concentrated in the Democrats.  That was Senator Brown's point.  Johnston should be thanked for helping to illustrate it.

Johnston's successor, John Walsh, was even more dismissive.  "Scott Brown wants to talk about anything other than what he's doing in Washington," Walsh said. "Anything to change the topic."  Cute, but with the DiMasi trial popping Beacon Hill's zits all over the front pages day after day, it isn't we Republicans who are desperate to change the subject just now.

The Democrats' ineptitude is understandable; it has been a while since the most popular politician in Massachusetts was a Republican.  You'd probably have to go back to Bill Weld.  But come on.  This is one of those times when the better part of wisdom and valor would be for the Democrats to agree with their adversary.  As much as they wish people would quit saying it, Sal DiMasi is the third House Speaker in a row to find himself on the wrong side of an indictment.  No other state can match that streak.  None comes close.  It's ridiculous.

By refusing to acknowledge that big, fat elephant sitting in the corner of their living room, the Democrats only compound their difficulties... READ THE REST at CriticalMass

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

windage and elevation (3.00 / 1)
the democratic political machine is only a reflection of the people who have enabled the corruption.

Timing is everything. (0.00 / 0)
Shouldn't Scott Brown have stood up and made his points about Beacon Hill Corruption when he was ON Beacon Hill? By waiting until last week to say anything doesn't make Brown a hero. He should have stood up and said something in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, or 2009.

Also - just curious - why do we celebrate Scott Brown for attacking Democrats at a commencement ceremony while condemning Gov. Patrick for doing the same at the Kennedy Institute groundbreaking?


what makes you think he hasn't before? (0.00 / 0)
Just because the media didn't cover one of six State Senators doesn't mean Brown hasn't railed agaiinst one party rule before.

Oh and what was all that talk he did on the campaign trail about fighting the "Beacon Hill Machine"?

Give me a break.  This is an opportune time because of the Sal Dimasi trial.

I will give you there are corrupt republicans.  But in Massachusets the democratic party is toeing the line between political party and crime family

Full Disclosure


http://www.redmassgroup.com/pr...


[ Parent ]
Thanks for the answer. (0.00 / 0)
Thanks, Rob, for taking the time to answer. I do appreciate it.

I understand that this is an opportune time, but claiming that Brown has railed against corruption before is pointless if he didn't do it publicly. I want the corruption out as much as you do, but Brown should have shown true political courage (and would have had plenty of media coverage) if he stood up as a sitting member of the body and accusing it of being corrupt. That was my point in saying he should've spoken up sooner. Saying it at a cocktail party fundraiser doesn't really count.


[ Parent ]
Hmmmm.... (0.00 / 0)
ah yes...the tired ole tactic of attacking the messenger.

...and yet, the corruption in one party in this Commonwealth continues.  Do you have anything negative to say about your party's corruption in Massachusetts or is "I hate Scott Brown!!" your only and final answer?

Pathetic...

"I acknowledge having racist and classist and sexist feelings of white male superiority." -John Howard


[ Parent ]
You're pathetic... (0.00 / 0)
Of course I recognize that MEMBERS of the Democratic party have been corrupt. Not all members of the Mass Democratic Party are corrupt, but there are some. As Rob points out above, there are corrupt Republicans, too. It's an issue, and it needs to be dealt with. I do my part by voting for politicians that aren't corrupt or shady. Just because there's a "D" after their name doesn't automatically make them corrupt. Beyond the Mass Dems, I think the Dimasi trial is rubbing in our faces what we already know: the speaker has too much power. Hopefully something can be done about that, but that would likely require the liberal Democrats and the Republican caucus to come together and take a stand. That's dangerous for the liberals, though, because if the changes were to not go through, they'd be at the mercy of a much-too-powerful speaker. I heard former State Rep. Matt Patrick speak a few months ago about how the legislature REALLY works, and I was horrified. Why do we bother electing representatives when all the decisions for our communities are being decided by the Gentleman from Winthrop?

I don't hate Scott Brown. Scott Brown is a very nice man who I've met and respect as my Senator. He doesn't represent my values, so I intend to vote for someone else in November of 2012.

I see some irony in your comments calling me pathetic for "attacking the messenger" for two reasons: First off, the League of Women Voters is going after a vote Sen. Brown made, and the MA GOP and Sen. Brown are now focused on going after the LWV instead of defending Brown's vote. That's a case of attacking the messenger if I ever saw one. Now you're attacking me because you don't like what I said, and you didn't answer my questions. So yes, the "ole tactic" is tired, but I'm not the one using it.

I raised two questions: Why did Brown wait until now? Rob Eno answered that above. My other question was why it was OK for Brown to talk politics here, but not for the Gov. talk politics at the Kennedy groundbreaking. Simple questions in regard to Brown's ongoing double standards. That's all. Sorry for not sticking 100% to the topic of this post, as it seems to have made you go haywire.

Like you said, "Pathetic..."


[ Parent ]
No (0.00 / 0)
YOUR pathetic...

Go ahead and point out the corrupt Republicans in this state and I will help run them out of office.
The speaker does not have too much power.  The speaker in a supermajority party has too much power.  Your answer to the problem?  Vote for more of the supermajority.
Sen Brown can defend his own votes.....but you're even more pathetic for equating the MAGOP for pointing out that the LWV is part of the LAM if MA.....I'll further point out that not only are they flaming liberals hiding behind a false claim of unbiased BS...but that their ad was deliberately misleading to play on women to get them to vote for whatever Dem there is.  Deliberately misleading is the cousin of lying.
I'll let you know when I'm "attacking you"....thinking that the MADP doesn't have a corruption problem because not all are corrupt is equally pathetic....akin to believing that Islam doesn't have a terrorist problem because not all Muslims are terrorists...hint...that not all Dems are corrupt is not relevant and the fallacy does not get rid of the notion that the Party has a problem in MA.

Why wait until now?  ...because he wanted to.  I believe he could mention ANYTHING right now and you'd whine about him waiting until now.

You already are haywire, I'm just the catalyst.  

"I acknowledge having racist and classist and sexist feelings of white male superiority." -John Howard


[ Parent ]
Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.








Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox