Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.


Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette





Candidate Tech Review: Senator Brown

by: edfactor

Tue Jan 24, 2012 at 03:18:40 AM EST


In an ongoing series of reviews about MassGOP candidate web technology, it is time to look at Scott Brown, whose campaign just launched a new website.

Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with the campaign in any way. I have no insider knowledge. I have never met any technical people on his campaign. All of this is based on what a technical person can find out through public sources. These are all just my opinions, and I don't want anything in return.

This post will have the following sections:

- Introduction
- Executive Summary
- Evaluation Categories
-- Raise Money
-- Get Volunteers Involved
-- Engage the media
-- Advertise the issues
-- Advertise the biography of the candidate
-- Support get-out-the-vote activities
- Pure Technology Stuff (of no interest to normal humans)

Introduction

There will be money and media from all over the country in this race, which will be one of the most expensive in the country. Technology will be a crucial part of this campaign, and if one candidate gains a huge advantage in technology, it could be decisive. As both campaigns have millions of dollars, they can do literally anything they want - so I am going to pull no punches, and recommend things no one is doing yet. They, like the presidential primary candidates, should be leading, not following. This is only a review of Senator Brown's stuff, but I will point out contrasts with Professor Warren's stuff where it makes sense.

Executive Summary (if you don't want to read the whole thing)

Senator Brown's web technology is solid, but not innovative. The new website is a major improvement! He is now slightly ahead of Professor Warren at the moment, as his main site is better than hers. I am certain she will do more, though. If she either does a lot more custom development or moves her content to a souped-up implementation of Nation Builder (a full-suite campaign tool that the Democrats love) then she could jump ahead of him. He needs to do much more.

So... if I were Senator Brown's tech manager, I would consider some of the following:

- Have fewer volunteer forms, improve them, and let people manage their volunteer and communication preferences
- Shut down the Brown Brigade Ning site and figure out how to re-create it on Facebook (pages, groups, and apps)
- Add calendars for campaign events, media, and volunteers
- Get a map showing locations of upcoming events, look for ways to use Foursquare and Facebook places for events and GOTV (maybe a map in Facebook that lets people add their Brown yard sign as a pin for everyone to see)
- Add more Facebook applications to the FB page, including the store for campaign gear, a reward system (like Jon Huntsman had)
- Figure out how to incorporate content from fans into the site (maybe volunteer videos - perhaps a weekly "I like Scott Brown because...." contest on YouTube).
- Improve the already-great issues section on the website with contrasting (color-coded) positions by Professor Warren
- Set up the technology and process to stage a "practice election" one month before the general, managed by technology - where people "check in" to polling places (Foursquare / FB Places), use collaboration tools to report results, etc.  
- Consider having the senator use a mobile check-in service for tours around the state, so people could follow his travels online
- Make sure there is a mobile version of the main site (css issue)
- Build an online tool (connected to or inside Facebook) where people can "commit" to voting for Senator Brown (President Obama's people built this for Democrat candidates in 2010 - where you could declare your intent and share it with your friends).

(read more...)

edfactor :: Candidate Tech Review: Senator Brown
DETAILED EVALUATION  

Raise Money

Senator Brown uses at least two platforms: Fundly and Fundraise.com. Fundly is really good. He is using Fundraise.com to allow people to have their own site to raise money for him. (Look for the "Become a fundraiser" button on this page: https://www.fundraise.com/scot...  It's the kind of thing that lets everyone be... kind of like a bundler!)  He also uses the Fundraise.com app on his Facebook page.

Warren Comparison: She uses her own fundraising page, and connects to ActBlue (a democrat online fundraising clearinghouse) also. She does not allow people to become their own fundraisers online as Brown does. But she does have a nice landing-page-auto-start video on her fundraising page. I think that works well.

Get Volunteers Involved

So in 2012, this is about social media outreach and channeling people into doing things that help the campaign. His Twitter and Facebook pages are pretty good, in terms of content and frequency. Yes, it would be better if consumers were given more to "do" (contests, fun things) but he's doing well here. (You can like and follow him directly from his main website, that's good.)

How is he doing on volunteer intake? He takes in volunteers though the text messaging signup, through the signup application on Facebook, through joining the Brown Brigade, through the email signup on the top of his website, through the "Get Involved" form on his main site, and lastly through the signup for the Truth Squad. (I am not counting signing up for a fundraising page for Fundraise.com)

That sounds like a nightmare to manage. I recommend campaigns use Wufoo for forms (like his previous Truth Squad signup), so everything, including the forms on Facebook, can all dump information into the same system.  Brown did use Wufoo before, but when he moved to Wordpress for this site, he switched all his site forms to Gravity Forms - which is like Wufoo, but is only for Wordpress. This means that those forms go to one place (perhaps) but that the Facebook signup page (a strange form from an email product called "Genius Mailer" that is owned by the Prosper Group) will lead to somewhere else, most likely.

So... I can sign up for email updates in multiple places? What's the difference to the end user with all of these forms? If I do a truth squad signup, do I do other forms? If I sign up in Facebook with my email and zip, do I then have to join the Brown Brigade or fill out the volunteer form on the main site? (This is way too confusing.)

Also, what am I getting into with the text message signup? Everyone in the party uses the same text message banner, but no one tells me if I am signing up to get fundraising solicitations in the middle of the night or alerts to call into talk radio. He needs to make it clear what the text signup does, or else people like me will never sign up. Perhaps there might be different options for what I get texted about.

As for the forms themselves, they don't say what you're getting into. What does it mean to join the truth squad?  I liked the big "Get Involved" form, though it is weird that I can check a box at the end saying that I don't want to be involved at this time. (What the hell does that mean?) I do think they should add a field or two on what someone is willing to do (social media outreach, GOTV, lit drops, etc). They did a tiny bit of this on the Brown Brigade signup, asking about making phone calls, etc.

I can't see them finding a way to manage all these inputs from all these places effectively. They have got to re-think how they take in volunteers. If I join the campaign as a volunteer, I should be "on the team" and then I can manage my communication preferences on a separate page from then on. I don't want to have to sign up in many places (FB, top of main site, Get Involved form, and Brown Brigade).

Let's get to the Brown Brigade (BrownBrigade.ning.com). It is a separate site with a Scott Brown Supporter-only social network. It is a Ning site - they offer private and public social networks and were all the rage a couple of years ago. However, Facebook has become more popular and more sophisticated. The burden of getting people go act like they are on Facebook somewhere else... is really high. Do I think this is worth it? No. The only reason to make someone socialize elsewhere is if there is fantastic, unique, content there and if they, in that space, can really help the campaign in a way that they cannot in Facebook. I have poked around the Brown Brigade, and I think it no longer makes sense. Almost everything I have seen can be done in Facebook and would be more useful there. I think they should convert the Brown Brigade either into a series of Facebook groups and pages, or, if they really want to innovate, create a new Facebook application for volunteers to use.

I think more needs to be done with maps and location technology for volunteers. I should be able to see where events are going to be, and I should be able to check-in at events and get rewards.

Oh - as for email... I actually like Senator Brown's emails. They look nice! (The signatures on the emails are a nice touch).  They use a firm called Exact Target for their email campaigns. I haven't used it, but it looks quite good.

Senator Brown also allows comments on his articles on his site (like media articles). I would probably switch that to Facebook comments to improve the quality of the submissions (as you don't have anonymous stuff, etc).

Lastly, I think there should be a Google calendar that volunteers can subscribe to, which also has a map that shows where Senator Brown will be over the next several months.

Engage the media

Senator Brown doesn't have to get the media to notice him, as other MassGOP candidates need to. He has to manage them. Some of this is through social media, as they follow the people they cover. I think Brown is doing well on social media.

Also, his "issues" page is very good. Things are broken down into topics, which bring up a dedicated page for each one. This will help the press see where he is on things.

I like that the "in the press" section features stuff from smaller outlets, not just the big papers. That shows the little guys they will get featured also.

I would probably go further and put up some of my voting record and perhaps some fun things (word clouds of my speeches, online tools and graphics showing the polarization of Congress). Also, I think he should have a form just for media inquiries so he can manage those better, especially from the smaller sources that he doesn't want to overlook. Relevant to that last bit, he should feature press he gets from small blogs, etc. That would motivate the grassroots.

Maybe there should be a media-specific Google calendar that the press can subscribe to that would have major events.


Advertise the issues

As I said above, Senator Brown has a great issues page with links to issue-specific pages that contain articles that support the position. Fantastic. I also love how there are Facebook and Twitter links to share Brown's positions on things!

I might go further, and with different color-coding, include contrasting positions from Professor Warren alongside my own stances.

Biography

Senator Brown's new website is a vast improvement over the old one. He has a nice biography page, and a wonderful timeline showing highlights from his life. (It includes everything except the word "Republican". Hmmm....) Anyway, I don't want to leave out the wonderful details about his personality on his Facebook info page here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/...  I love seeing what his favorite TV shows and quotes are! In contrast, Elizabeth Warren's page here: http://www.facebook.com/Elizab... just lists her likes, which are (in order) Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, U.S. Department of the Treasury, The White House, Harvard Law School, Enact the Consumer Financial Protection Agency! (boring)

Overall, I think Senator Brown does a great job showing who he is.

Support get-out-the-vote activities

So, the difficulty above with all the forms and the Brown Brigade and differing levels of information has got to be a nightmare on the back-end of their systems. I can't see a great system to manage volunteers toward getting out the vote. Leaving the integration issues aside, I think the forms should be modified in order to help GOTV. Volunteers should be able to indicate that they want to do GOTV and are in a position to help.

I'm a big fan of location check-in technology, which campaigns largely don't use. I think the Brown people should have volunteers create "Scott Brown" check-in locations on Foursquare and Facebook outside every polling place in the state. They can then "practice" some GOTV stuff with volunteers (make a game out of it) checking into polling places two weeks before in a mock election or something. Brown should also a reward for checking in at the polling place (but NOT for voting - so you don't run afoul of election laws).

Pure Technology Stuff (of no interest to normal humans)

So Senator Brown decided to do a Wordpress installation to replace his rather stale Drupal site. OK, Wordpress is pretty good - and I want to see if they do any custom plugins, or if they make clever use of all the stuff already out there. They also decided to host on Rackspace, just like Mitt Romney (who also uses Amazon EC2 for static content). That's good. I think they are using the Rackspace Cloud Sites hosting option, which is a $149/month option with upcharging for heavy traffic. This is a great choice, as they should get the scalability they need with no extra effort.

Interesting that Professor Warren went with a custom-designed site hosted by Trilogy Interactive. Will they do more custom development? Can they handle not getting all the built-in functionality that you get with a Drupal or Wordpress installation? Her hosting infrastructure also doesn't look nearly as scalable as his does. I wonder if they stay with the custom stack, or whether the cool kids in the White House campaign operation convince her to port her design to Nation Builder. I think there is a good chance she does that.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

on the multiple sign ups (0.00 / 0)
Isn't that permission marketing 101?

If I sign up for emails on the website, I've not consented to join a ning network like the brown brigade, which I would never do.  I already belo ng to Facebook and see no reason to join ning.

Full Disclosure


http://www.redmassgroup.com/pr...


Permissions, of course (0.00 / 0)
Of course, I should know what I am signing up for. What I mean is that on a form, there should be checkboxes for what I want to do. So I should have options for: joining the Truth Squad (and some text saying what that means), for certain kinds of emails, for volunteering, and maybe to register for the Brown Brigade.

You should also be able to modify those choices also down the road if you don't want to get certain stuff (maybe I have lost interest in the Truth Squad messages).

So take me as an example. I get Scott Brown emails. I don't remember signing up for them (my email is probably left over from the special election). What information do they have about me? Am I on the volunteer list? The truth squad list? I don't know. It would be great for me to log in and manage that.

They could have one big form that lets me opt-in to anything, visible in several places, or they could have multiple forms that let me sign up for different things, where I wouldn't have to enter information more than once, and it was clear what I was doing.


[ Parent ]
Tisei will be up next! (0.00 / 0)
I have decided to do a review of Tisei's web stuff in a few weeks. His wordpress site is actually surprisingly good! But I will have a lot to say about what he is doing, but I won't repeat very much from this review.

If there is someone else you'd like me to talk about this year, please email me or suggest someone in the comments.


This is great stuff. (0.00 / 0)


---
"That it ceased to exist, I'll grant you, but whether or not it failed cannot be definitively said." - Metropolitan (1990)


New Site (0.00 / 0)
Ed,

Great job.  Quick question.  I just received an email announcing a new Scott Brown website and wonder how many of the items you mention here are included in the new version.  Not being a tech guy its hard to tell how much really changed or not.  Sure you also received the same email so is it possible to give a quick note on anything that changed?

Thanks


This was for new site (0.00 / 0)
Hi -

I had originally reviewed the old site, yet a mere two days before I went to publish, they put out this new one. So I re-did the whole review in light of their new site.

The old one was not nearly as good, and I was glad to see that they had made many improvements. I was going to say that Professor Warren had a better site than Senator Brown did, but now I can say the opposite. Of course, it will be a race.

I am certain Warren's people are going to do much more, as they have a lot of money and there is a lot of tech talent on the left who will beg to do more with her site and Facebook page. Brown's people have to keep moving forward, especially now before things get crazy.  


[ Parent ]
Keep a separate site for Brown Brigade (0.00 / 0)
I don't think it's a good idea to try to do through Facebook, because only liberal statuses are acceptable on Facebook. Conservatives would rather just keep their conservatism to themselves on Facebook, and just share in the cat pictures and music videos, as if they had no political views whatsoever. So they need a separate secret site, like say RedMassGroup, to express themselves and reveal their non-PC controversial opinions. If their only option to organize with a Republican campaign was through Facebook, I bet most people just wouldn't do it, to avoid being ostracized by all their friends.

John- Are you actually on Facebook? (0.00 / 0)
Because your description of it isn't my understanding based on the fact that I have about 1,000 Conservative/Republican/Tea Party Facebook friends.

I think that Web sites are getting to be old hat, and only really useful as a place to take a check and provide pushcard type information.

Ed has ideas to make them more useful, and I follow his writing with interest.


[ Parent ]
There are worries, and we need closed spaces (0.00 / 0)
Mr. Howard -

Yes, some conservatives worry about the fact that Facebook is built and maintained by Democrats and celebrated by a technology elite that is not Republican. Similarly, there are online tools, like NationBuilder.com - which is a revolutionary online tool for politics - but it is a side project of Organizing For America - a liberal advocacy group for Obama. (It is open for use by anybody and they have pledged not to discriminate.)

Our party brand has turned off virtually every internet technology guy in my field. Because of that, we're stuck using tools that conservatives didn't build and don't control. We have to get over that and use the tools anyway.

I agree that conservatives need closed spaces sometimes to work on certain projects. (We can't discuss everything on RMG after all!) I hope the GOP, libertarians, and the Tea Pary can create more public and private spaces that can help us all succeed.


[ Parent ]
This sounds like a job for the Koch brothers. (0.00 / 0)
What I mean by that is this: there are some conservatives in these fields (web development/graphic design) that would love to build the types of systems that Ed is talking about. Maybe someone needs to approach monied conservatives to finance such an endeavor. Then it would be built and controlled by conservatives. I'm not talking about making a new Facebook, but the campaign tools that Ed is talking about. We wouldn't then have to rely on "the other side" for our digital infrastructure.

G.O.P. Growth. Opportunity. Prosperity. For all Americans.

Karl (TLC)Weld


[ Parent ]
Yes, Karl! (0.00 / 0)
I absolutely think that there needs to be some big conservative dollars behind political technology. Well, let me re-phrase that. There are great private tools that get sold to wealthy campaigns that you and I will never see.

What we need is conservatives to build free and cheap tools that can be used by us right-wing nobodies. But that will be hard. (see comment below replying to Bill)


[ Parent ]
Interesting Sidebar (0.00 / 0)
Our party brand has turned off virtually every internet technology guy in my field.

Why do you feel so? Statistically speaking, your field is filled with upper middle class people who are being targeted as "rich" by liberal rhetoric. Certainly, not everyone makes their decisions based upon tax policy; however, what is the party doing that is turning off your entire field? If it's social issues, is there a reason why your entire field is socially liberal while the country as a whole is not?

On twitter @bfrivers


[ Parent ]
I'd like to take a swing at that. (0.00 / 0)
So I'm running for office and go to see a guy with money. Long time townie, runs the largest RE business in town.

After he writes me a check, he says, "Thanks for coming in. I just wanted to make certain you weren't a kook."

The Dems practice politics as a career. By the time they reach runs for significant public office they have been vetted, and the better ones are in the front of the line.

We have lots of people that just "throw their hat in the ring" and then represent our party, and this is at all levels.

Check out this guy that ran for State Senate near me in 2010

Cole

Cole said he raised no money and what little campaigning he did, he did on his own. He received help collecting the required signatures to get on the ballot, but not much after that, he said. He said he couldn't afford wooden signs so he printed his name and message on white copying paper and stapled them to trees, poles and on bulletin boards in large housing developments in Newburyport

He didn't think he was going to win the primary, and as soon as he did he dropped out

Cole 2

Those of you who go way back might remember the John Lakain fiasco (there are others more recent, but I always liked how stupid a person could be to but significant misrepresentations at that level).

In 1982, John Lakian ran for the Republican party nomination for governor. He was the early favorite after securing the party's endorsement. Lakian spent nearly $1 million on his failed bid. After a The Boston Globe story revealed that he had made several exaggerations about his background, he was forced to publicly confess and lost the nomination to John W. Sears. Supporters blamed the loss on The Boston Globe, claiming it had unfairly defamed Lakian.

As a result, Lakian sued The Globe for libel, claiming $50 million in damages. The court case drew national media attention and eventually resulted in The Globe being cleared of all charges. The jury found that the article contained some false information, but awarded no judgment, stating that Lakian had failed to prove any actual harm. Lakian appealed and the case was finally resolved in 1987 when the Massachusetts Supreme Court rejected the appeal.

More recently of course, Herman Cain. Michelle Bachman, even Ron Paul comes across a little wacky to the average independent. I'll leave Newt off the table for now.

While we can all say that the Democrats are devils, even the most liberal among them appear to be pretty normal (and for the most part they act normal) and this is what they see.

The average person (particularly watching SNL) sees a number of us as kooks. I am forced to defend the party at work et al every time some nutty thing comes up in the media.


[ Parent ]
MA is different than country at large (0.00 / 0)
I believe edfactor was talking about the National Republican brand as opposed to the MA one. Certainly in Massachusetts, where we have don't contest the majority of seats, there will be a lot of candidates who don't represent the party well. However, the vetting the Democrats naturally do here occurs for our party in most other states.

Making fun of Republicans gets ratings, and making fun of Democrats get you boycotted. That's not going to change. It's an interesting media phenomena that liberals have the corner on comedy/satire shows lampooning Republicans, while they can't break into the talk radio field despite numerous attempts. I agree that many people ascertain their perception of the GOP (and politics in general) from shows like SNL and the Daily Show. That doesn't mean we have a monopoly on kooky people in our party; however, it's portrayed like the only weird people on Capitol Hill are from the GOP.

Democrats have members of Congress who believe a military base is going to cause the country of Guam to tip over. I mean imagine if a Republican said, "we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy," like former Speaker Pelosi. Again, imagine the outrage/ridicule from those shows if a Republican said something as racist as gaffe machine VP Biden: "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man." I could go on and on.

Just being a Republican means you're going to be in a very personally trying time running for high office. The lack of reporting on and serious questions of President Obama during the last cycle was laughable in comparison to the gauntlet a typical GOP candidate runs. In turn, our candidate pool becomes limited to those who have the inside track on the nomination (Dole, Bush, Romney, etc.), or those who are ideologues and are trying to make a point on the extreme side of an issue or set of issues. Of course, Democrats have those too (Kucinich, Dean, Sharpton, etc.), but they aren't the feature of the media in the news or on the comedy shows.

On twitter @bfrivers


[ Parent ]
We both forgot about Weiner (0.00 / 0)
but somehow "wide stance" Craig has had more staying power.

See what I mean? I'm not happy about it either. I wish it was easier.


[ Parent ]
Let me qualify that last statement a bit (0.00 / 0)
So, as in most fields, there are the leaders and there are those who just work in the field. In software development, there are plenty of Republicans. For instance, I was on a client visit several months ago in Dallas, and met a bunch of programmers who are certainly not voting for Obama in 2012. But they just punch a clock at a big bank somewhere. They aren't inventing anything.

The leaders of my field, the ones who invent new things, start companies like Twitter, create the technical standards that everyone uses, and dominate the technology press (on sites like techcrunch.com) are not Republicans. Why?

- They live on the coasts, not in the heartland
- They are a very diverse bunch (though few women) and they are very tolerant group of people.
- Many are recent immigrants
- They are very educated and scientific
- They are often committed to working on public domain projects, where no one owns the results. (I just can't emphasize how public domain projects dominate our field. Even Red Mass Group, when the underlying software was built in 1998 is more than half public domain code) Republicans don't "get" open source. The Wall Street Journal, just three days ago, said open source was related to Occupy Wall Street.

So when this diverse, coastal, tolerant crowd sees angry white guys on television from the south and West talking about how global warming isn't happening, and sounding anti-immigrant and anti-gay - they really don't want to be a part of that at all.

I think the issue isn't really policy. In fact, I meet many tech leaders who sound a whole lot like Republicans on lots of issues. It's more of a cultural and demographic thing.

So let's take Boston. Of the tech elite in this area, let's say that was 250 guys, of which I probably know 200 of them. I would say that I am one of maybe 15 who are Republican or Libertarian. That doesn't mean the rest are Democrats. They are often non-political, but will probably vote Democrat.

Does this matter? Yes - we can't let the most vibrant and interesting part of the whole economy be led by people who work for the other side. Sure, some are slowly crawling back as the Democrats look like they are going to ruin their tech-savvy country, but we could do a lot more to appeal to them, such as sensible immigration reform, better intellectual property policies, and being more tolerant.


[ Parent ]
Maybe (0.00 / 0)
Sure, I could start Liking all kinds of conservative links and friending Sarah Palin and what not, but it'd only cause trouble and strife. It's fine to see all my friends post standard liberal stuff, it's not obnoxious because it's just so expected that everyone agrees with standard hollywood liberalism. Posting my opinions, or even standard lame Sean Hannity style opinions would just annoy all my friends and cause me grief in the real world.

So I wouldn't try to compete on Facebook. I know RMG got lots of likes, but I only liked BMG (sorry, but my girlfriend wanted a BMG mug!)


[ Parent ]
Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.








Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox