Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.


Advertisement


Join Our Email List
Email:  
For Email Marketing you can trust


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette


Advertisement


Press to Patrick/Murray: Can You Hear Us Now?

by: CriticalDan

Fri Feb 17, 2012 at 12:13:11 PM EST


I went "paperless" on all my bills a long time ago. So, like Patrick Administration, I do not receive itemized cell phone bills.

But if I find myself needing to check out the particulars on my usage for any given month, day or hour - dating back to day 1 of my Verizon Wireless contract - all the specific info I could ever want is but a few mouse clicks away. Amazing, these internets.

For one reason or another, when they came into office the Patrick Administration decided to stop receiving itemized cell phone records for the dozens of Executive Office staffers who use state-issued smart phones. Why? "Efficiency." Here's a blurb from the State House News:


In letters responding to requests for information from the Boston Globe and Boston Herald, state Public Records Division Assistant Director Shawn Williams said that during a phone conversation last month Abim Thomas, deputy chief counsel in Gov. Deval Patrick's office, told him that the executive department does not receive detailed cell phone invoices, but does receive summarized invoices.

"Attorney Thomas explained that the Department formerly obtained detailed invoices, but changed this practice at the beginning of the Patrick Administration in January 2007," Williams wrote in a letter dated Thursday. "The Department now receives summary invoices that indicate usage information for each respective period, by user, but provide no detail as to incoming or outgoing calls."

Asked what spurred the 2007 change, Kimberly Haberlin, Gov. Patrick's press secretary, said in an email to the News Service, "Nearly fifty members of the Executive Office staff use a blackberry for work. Changing to summary invoices streamlined our billing process and helped achieve administrative efficiencies."


It is hard to argue with the Administration's reasoning. God knows, particularly when paying bills with taxpayer money nothing gets in the way of "efficiencies" quite like "details" and "information." Such things quite often result in other efficiency-busters, like "questions" or even "criticism." Best to just pay the bills and take it on faith that EO employees and electeds aren't using their state-issued phones to - oh, I don't know - talk to political operatives or make fundraising calls. If ignorance is bliss, intentional ignorance is ecstasy.

It is obvious that if the Administration (oft self-described as the most transparent in history) wished to reveal the particulars of LG Murray's cell phone usage, it could easily obtain the information... READ THE REST at CriticalMASS

CriticalDan :: Press to Patrick/Murray: Can You Hear Us Now?
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Hypocrisy (0.00 / 0)
As a former public official (school committee), I can tell you that a request for public records handled locally in a manner consistent with the Patrick administration would turned into problems with the local D. A. Coakley may now handle such issues, but you get my point. Regardless of the motovation of the party making the request, there is no reason other than a want to hide something for the Verizon Wireless records to not be turned over.

Ultimately the destruction of Tim's state owned auto might be on par with the damage done to his career. And to think he is paying for this advice.  

"Never, never, never give up" - Winston Churchill


FOX news had Murray all twisted up (0.00 / 0)
Just kept repeating, "I wasn't texting, I wasn't e-mailing."

Two points (0.00 / 0)

(1) I haven't researched this to see if there is some exemption for the Governor or Lt. Governor personally but the first line for appeal on public records is the Secretary of State's office. If the Prince of Darkness has jurisdiction, it will interesting to see if he twists the knife.

(2) I have served in senior positions in both state and federal government. Every month I would get a list of phone calls that I had made on the government phone. I was expected to note which calls were "personal" and reimburse the government. Itemizing calls was standard. But that was under Republican administrations when transparency and personal accountability was apparently higher.


On the appeal point (0.00 / 0)
As a legal matter, the Gov's counsel is correct: nothing in the law obligates the to "create" a "public record" that does not exist.  Apparently there is no itemized accounting of the LG's calls within the executive office's custody or control (by their conscious choice).  Even if there were, the counsel's office could be expected to assert executive privilege based on case law that holds (in a nutshell) that the Governor and his officers are entitled to confidentiality in their deliberations. Obviously the LG's conversations with his political cronies don't fall within that category, but Patrick's wouldn't be the first legal counsel to rely broadly on the SJC decision from which that doctrine emanates.  The larger point is the obvious one: if the LG's phone records exonerated him of the various charges being bandied about, they'd be obtained and then released.  Whether they merely confirm the prevailing wisdom or would actually make the scandal worse remains to be seen.  One thing is for sure: nothing irritates the press quite so much as a public records stiff-arm.  

[ Parent ]

Advertisement

Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.





Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox