Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
July 2014
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Boston Maggie
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Miss Kelly
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Left in Lowell
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Mass. Media
The Lone Republican
Pundit Review
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
National
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State




Hillary Care Contained Provision Allowing Employers to Restrict Health Coverage by Moral Conviction

by: Rob "EaBo Clipper" Eno

Mon Feb 27, 2012 at 13:22:21 PM EST


In 1994 Senator Mitchell introduced S 2351, which was adopted by Bill Clinton as the "Hillary Care" bill.  The University of Virginia has a summary of the actions surrounding Hillary Care, which can be found here (GoogleDoc Version Page 8).  

August 2[1994] Senate Majority Leader Mitchell unveiled a Senate leadership bill. (1994 CQA)

August 4[1994] President Clinton announced that he would support the Mitchell bill. (NYT, 9/27/94)

August 9[1994] The Senate began floor debate on Mitchell's bill, S. 2351.  Republican Senators as a group opposed Mitchell's plan, and they were joined by a number of conservative Southern Democratic senators.  Even at this early date, the Mitchell bill was in big trouble. (CQA, 1994)

Section 21223 of that bill provided for the exact same "Kennedy Clause" language that is in the Blunt Amendment.

`SEC. 21223. PROVISIONS RELATING TO RELIGIOUS BELIEF OR MORAL CONVICTION.

   `Nothing in this title shall be construed to--

       `(1) prevent any individual from purchasing a standard benefits package which excludes coverage of abortion services, if the individual objects to abortion on the basis of a religious belief or moral conviction;

       `(2) prevent any employer from contributing to the purchase of a standard benefits package which excludes coverage of abortion or other services, if the employer objects to such services on the basis of a religious belief or moral conviction;

       `(3) require any health professional or health facility to perform or assist in the performance of any health care service, if the health professional or facility objects to performing or assisting in the performance of such a service on the basis of a religious belief or moral conviction; and

       `(4) require any commercial insurance company, Blue Cross plan, integrated health plan, or any other organization that assumes health insurance risk to offer a package including abortion or other services, if the health plan sponsor objects to covering such services on the basis of a religious belief or moral conviction.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) sponsored this legislation on behalf of the Democratic leadership.  This Bill was the Hillary Care bill that Majority Leader Mitchell brought to the floor of the Senate.  This bill was never voted on, and is the Hillary Care legislation that was proposed.

A direct exemption for employers, allowing them to purchase health coverage that excludes "abortion or other services".  

The Massachusetts Democratic Party, too liberal not only for Senator Kennedy, but Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and Hillary Clinton.

Rob "EaBo Clipper" Eno :: Hillary Care Contained Provision Allowing Employers to Restrict Health Coverage by Moral Conviction
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Big difference between HillaryCare and ObamaCare.... (0.00 / 0)
Hillary was willing to allow a 'Morality' clause in order to get it passed.  But now that ObamaCare has already passed the progressives think they will have to surrender ground and move backwards by allowing a 'morality' clause.

Hillary never wanted to allow a 'morality' clause, but in order to get something passed she was willing to 'temporarily' tolerate it.  Obamacare has passed already so to retrofit it with a 'morality' clause is like taking a big step backwards.  

Like Pelosi said "We have to pass it to find out what is in it".  

Ed Markey is now the official 'cheapest' man on earth.  1.5 percent to charity while the average American gave 3 times as much...





Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox