Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.


Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette





Post-Election Deja-Vu: GOP State Committee Meeting

by: The Angelic One

Wed Nov 14, 2012 at 12:46:07 PM EST


Held in the Carver function room at the John Carver Inn in Plymouth (MA), last night's Massachusetts Republican State Committee meeting was a curious exercise in post-election analysis. The standing room only event had 65 out of the 80 state committee members in attendance with dozens of activists & onlookers - including Boston Herald "Lone Republican" columnist Holly Robichaud - seated off in the back of the room to watch the meeting unfold.

GOP Chairman Robert Maginn called the meeting to order at 7:25pm (25 minutes late from its scheduled 7pm start time). He dedicated both the opening prayer & pledge of allegiance to the memory of recently deceased GOP State Committeeman Bill Nickerson. In tribute to him, a video montage of Nickerson was presented & concluding remarks were given by a visibly emotional Brock Cordeiro, Nickerson's fellow state committeeman & a close friend.

The Nickerson tribute (which was NOT listed on the agenda) lasted a total of 25 minutes. Combined with the aforementioned late start, the meeting was almost an hour behind schedule. The activists & onlookers were getting restless & muttered to each other their displeasure at how the meeting at that point was being conducted.

The party's secretary & treasurer quickly gave their respective reports & received almost no probing questions from their fellow committee members. Maginn's report as the party chairman was one that tried to put a positive spin on the party's losses during the last election cycle. He used several sports analogies when he likened the party to the New England Patriots falling short while playing in the Super Bowl. Maginn pointed out that the loss of a few Republican legislative seats was statistically not as bad as it could have been given the nature of a presidential election year, a popular Democrat incumbent, & a rival party imbued with superior amounts of money, manpower, & technology.

He reminded the membership that the party did well raising money, building up its infrastructure (especially the analytics of its GOTV operations), & attracting more people to join the GOP. He said that the party was positioned to do well in the 2014 election cycle & that the state GOP had to work NOW in order to realize those potential gains. Maginn gave no public indication on whether or not he'd run for re-election as party chairman but activists such as Rabid Republican blogger "Iron" Mike Farquhar disseminated brightly colored pamphlets urging him to step down.

The Angelic One :: Post-Election Deja-Vu: GOP State Committee Meeting
Maginn asked State Representatives Keiko Orrall & Peter Durant to provide the membership with their respective perspectives on running for re-election during a challenging election cycle. Durant in particular urged the state committee to aggressively build upon the analytics of its GOTV operations. He cited the statewide & national success of the Democrats in micro-targeting voters so that they knew who would vote for them. "Start data-mining NOW for 2014," implored Durant. Although he was unable to attend the meeting, State Representative Ryan Fattman's thoughts on his election race were delivered in writing & read to the group by former GOP Congressman Peter Blute.

National Committeewoman Kerry Healey used her allotted time to give a pep talk to the group & advocate the importance of developing a "big tent" for the party given the changing demographics that show a growing presence of minorities & young people. National Committeeman Ron Kaufman provided the night's most somber assessment. He said he was "scared to death" over the results of the 2012 national election & that it made him "afraid for our country". Kaufman echoed Maginn's assessment that the state party managed to successfully hold down even greater "potential losses" that might have eliminated the legislative gains that were made in 2010. He cited national exit polls that indicated the GOP message won over a majority of voters but that it was not the Republicans but the Democrats who successfully "did small things in a big way" & that the GOP "needs to learn from that (experience)."

When the main item of the agenda was introduced - whether or not the state party would endorse the platform of the Republican National Committee (NRC) - a motion was made & quickly seconded to endorse Mitt Romney's presidential platform & add it to the state party's platform. The GOP State Committee, in effect, repudiated the platform of the NRC. With no discussion made about the motion in question, the Romney platform was overwhelmingly accepted by the membership through a voice vote. Maginn then agreed to suspend party rules to allow some of the activists in attendance to address the body for no more than five (5) minutes. Massachusetts Republican Assembly President Dave Kopacz, Sr., took the opportunity to remind his audience that the GOP won't "go wrong if we focus on a message of life, liberty, & property." Rich Howell received a standing ovation after delivering a fiery defense for the kind of conservatism embodied by Ronald Reagan & Ray Shamie. He concluded with the admonition that "we fail when we run away from our principles." Once the speeches were done, Maginn asked the group to go into executive session. Through a show of hands, a majority of them decided to do so & the remainder of the meeting was closed to the public.

From my perspective, the meeting had a whiff of deja-vu about it. The party wanted to accentuate the positive - which is fine - but it neglected to provide any serious analysis on why the state GOP fell short building upon the legislative gains that were made in 2010. Aside from Durant's observations, the party rarely tackled what the Democrats did & how their achieved the successes it achieved. No mention was made about Democrat Party Chairman John Walsh & his extremely sterling track record of getting Democrats elected, keeping Democrats in power, & building/broadening coalitions that benefit the Democrat Party every regular election cycle. Unlike their counterparts in the rival party, the state GOP seems to lack any interest in the kind of self-reflexivity & self-criticism that's necessary for genuine reform & growth. Unless such an interest takes place soon, the state GOP will be condemned to repeat the same mistakes over again.

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Maginn should have used this sports analogy of the MAGOP instead.. (5.00 / 2)
The state Republican Party is like a baseball team that is always hoping to send the 'long-ball' hitter to the box.  The Democrats send base runners and single hitters...

Does anyone esle get that impression?  We put all our hopes and dreams into a guy like Scott Brown, Charlie Baker or Mitt Romney.  We send them into the game hoping they will hit it out of the park.  Even the best hitters in baseball only hit 350 to 375 average..

On the other hand, the Democrats send in guys that hit singles, and then steal second, and steal third and then get home when the bases are full.....putting up point after point on the board...

Sometimes the Democrats get on base because they walk unchallenged to first base, simply because we can't throw strikes....  

The rebuilding of the MAGOP needs to change the fundamental idea that we can pin our hopes on a long ball hitter.  We have to stop looking for the home run hitter and start sending in guys that are willing to scratch and claw for every base they get.  

And one last thing - the 14 people that didn't show up to the committee meeting - they better have a damned good excuse for why they weren't there....

We are headed for a 'Fiscal Cliff' and the country just elected a dope whose motto is 'Forward'.  


Apt Sports Analogy (5.00 / 1)
Your sports analogy is more apt than the one produced by Maginn!

[ Parent ]
"State Committee... repudiated the platform of the NRC." (5.00 / 1)
I am not sure why you think that. The reason I changed the motion to the Romney platform is because that platform has exceptions for rape and incest and the RNC does not. Otherwise, the platform is the same.

I'm Only Reporting What I Witnessed (0.00 / 0)
As you know, the GOP State Committee was under tremendous pressure NOT to embrace the RNC platform. It decided instead to embrace the Romney platform. If you remember what happened last night, there was no discussion/debate at all with regards to why one platform was more preferable than the other. The speed of the vote taken was another indicator that the membership wanted this put behind them ASAP. I have to infer that in accepting the Romney platform, the membership did in fact repudiate the RNC version (probably due to the lack of exceptions you stated on the matter of abortion). Nor am I the only observer who picked up on that inference. The reporter for the Boston Globe's article clearly picked up the same vibe when he wrote his version of what happened last night in Plymouth.

[ Parent ]
only reporting (0.00 / 0)
  I am sorry in hindsight that I did not make the reason for the name change clear. I changed the language to include the exceptions for rape but did not want to get into the nitty grity of the platform. I thought that would open the discussion and then we would be discussing the different topics for hours. When I asked how we do this, move to include the exceptions, the suggestion was made to call it the Romney platform because that is where it came from. Also,I suggested that it be a voice vote. Since we had the votes, Maginn thought that would be fine unless it was unclear when we voted. Since you were there,you know it was a one-sided vote and, therefore, quite clear.
I do have to disagree with you that the membership wanted this behind them ASAP. I am sure some did. But, the majority of the people who wanted this to pass would have liked to have had their say on the floor.  It seemed best to move it on and let people say what they were going to in executive session.
With regards to the Globe, who knows why they write what they write. I never saw the reporter. Stephanie called me last week, but not yesterday or last night. I suspect that is why they got their headline wrong. Or maybe they did it on purpose.  Also, when the Globe writes an editorial suggesting what we should do, I am inclined to think the opposite course is the better way to go.

[ Parent ]
I Stand By My Story (0.00 / 0)
I'm not surprised the Boston Globe reporter slanted his story the way he did since it feeds into the narrative his employers like to push. But again, his interpretation on the significance of the vote is congruent with what I witnessed last night. One platform was rejected/repudiated by the membership while the other one was embraced.

I appreciate the context that you're providing on decisions that were obviously made behind the scenes. Obviously compromises were made to speed this agenda item through up to &, as you say, comments could be delayed until the executive session kicked in. But again - from my point of view without any of the details you're now bringing to light - the appearance given to the public was that the state committee repudiated one platform, quickly accepted another, did so without any real discussion about it, did it in record time, & then went into executive session.

Given that the public was excluded from witnessing executive session, there's no way it would be able to hear whatever comments that might have been made by some committee members pertaining to the platform vote.


[ Parent ]
Re-centered to a more pro-life position (0.00 / 0)
Angelic One, I rarely disagree with one of your assessments but let me provide a counter view from my own perspective.

As a State Committee member who considers himself a sold pro-life individual and conservative, including social, last night's vote was not a repudiation of the 2012 Republican National Convention Platform (although, I certainly understand how you could view it as such) but rather a remarkable acceptance of the pro-life position within the Massachusetts Republican Party.

As Patricia Doherty wrote, and yes she was the originator of the motion back in June, the language adopted last night was a compromise somewhere between the absolutely 100% pro-life  views concerning direct abortions, held by individuals such as  myself (as well documented here on RMG), and those of a libertarian and even a few possibly liberal minded colleagues who represent those positions.  You may recall that I spoke at some length in June AGAINST the Patricia's original motion on the procedural grounds that a vote to accept the 2012 RNC Platform (which did not even exist at the time as it was formally adopted in August) was incongruent with the policies and precedent of the quadrennial Platform Committee doing their duty.  The motion voted upon last night cleared up my procedural issues as well as my hesitation to endorse a document that possessed planks, such as regarding foreign policy, the relationship between states and federal agencies, and other matters that are strictly national in scope.  

Furthermore, I was someone who served upon the 2010 MassGOP Platform Committee and indeed I labored with my colleagues specifically upon the social values subcommittee.  We hotly debated and discussed Culture of Life issues at that time.  The document that existed prior to yesterday's vote was an incremental step towards social conservative values but it was a compromise that satisfied few.  For example, back then when there was an impasse over social conservative & libertarian views, I tried to insert a clause leaving matters to the fully formed consciences of the individual Republicans.  That did not fly.  The ultimate decision was to include some vague references that nodded in a socially conservative direction in a small section at the end of the 2010 MassGOP Platform (as positioned in the 2008 RNC Platform) that was an improvement over the brief few sentences in the 2006 MassGOP Platform that were basically entirely silent on the matter of social values.

Within this context, the vote last night was a quantum leap towards the right but done so in a respectful, welcoming, and inclusive approach.  Would I personally prefer the verbiage in the 2012 RNC Platform?  Absolutely!  I am a practicing & practical Catholic and for that I make no apology.  That said, platforms are statements of principle for political parties and not catechisms for churches or other religious institutions.  As such, I can accept & respect the compromise struck and passed overwhelmingly last night.  My constituents have elected me knowing my ideological & religious views but I constantly try to keep their views and interests forefront in my mind while voting at State Committee meetings.  Many of my constituents are libertarians and others a certainly pro-abortion in their choices.  I profoundly disagree with the latter but that is why I pray and engage in non-partisan Culture of Life advocacy through the Knights of Columbus.  This is a battle of hearts and minds.  Some people view me as overly rigid in my pro-life views here on RMG while others have apparently kicked me out of their political clubs for allegedly being too liberal.  

However, this post isn't meant to be about me.  Rather, my point is that a currently viable compromise was accepted so that throughout 2013, as the Platform Committee undergoes its work for the 2014 MassGOP State Convention and the ultimate acceptance by those delegates of the new Platform, the discussion will not be "if" socially conservative values should or should be addressed in the document but instead the likelihood is that the debate will be how strong the language should be in addressing these controversial but critical issues.  It's a delicate balance to strike but one that we as State Committee members, and ultimately the delegates, must strike.

Undoubtedly, some in the audience were confused, others may have been dismayed and upset but the debate has been refocused and the issue re-centered and done so in a way that that embracing and not rejecting of the broad ideological spectrum of Massachusetts Republicans.

"Tremendous pressure NOT embrace the RNC platform"?  I enthusiastically voted for it in Tampa back in August and I was prepared to do so last night but perhaps a better way at this point in time prevailed.  


[ Parent ]
Thanks For The Context (0.00 / 0)
But most of this is insider baseball. As an outsider, I reported what I witnessed. I didn't say that abortion/social issues were repudiated. I said the RNC platform was repudiated & that in its place the membership voted to accept the Romney presidential platform. That's a statement of fact. I'm agnostic over whether the vote taken was a worthwhile one but I can appreciate how said vote could & would be interpreted by the enemies of the Republican Party through their media proxies. From where I sat, a quickie vote was taken on a tough issue in order to move beyond it.

[ Parent ]
Exactly (0.00 / 0)
Very much of what the State Committee does is "inside baseball".  We basically pull the levers of the machinery to make sure the Party moves from election cycle to election cycle, hopefully victorious, so that the local committees and their grassroots activists can accomplish what needs to be done at the most basic, and most important, level.

The State Committee, and I'll absolutely include myself in this statement, waste more time debating, discussing, and far too often fighting like Hatfields & McCoys over minutia that in the grand scheme of things don't mean a damn thing.

We're engaged far too often drafting the he fine print of footnoted scripts for a melodrama soap opera.  

While always welcome & certainly invited, it's why I imagine being a guest at a State Committee meeting is so frustrating.  That real tragedy is the erroneous perception that there is so much secret or even life-and-death activity going on that these activists are being locked out of (literally or figuratively, as the case may be).  If only we were collectively being that productive to actually be so problematic.  The real work is done, has been done, and will always be done by the local committees and other activist groups.  At the end of the day, we're simply there to serve to make their activism that much easier and in some cases legally possible.

I would assert that the votes for the endorsement for the actual 2012 RNC Platform were probably there but out of a great sensitivity to public relations, and thus voter inclusion, the compromise came down for the Romney platform.

You reported accurately what you witnessed, an expedient vote was taken to try to undo a self-tied knot.  

My friend, context is everything.


[ Parent ]
Context Is Everything (0.00 / 0)
It certainly is, Brock. Thanks again for all that you do. I wish we had more people like you in the party.

[ Parent ]
Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.








Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox