Active Users
Currently 3 user(s) logged on.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette




A "Once In A Generation Event" For The MA GOP

by: The Angelic One

Sun Feb 03, 2013 at 23:50:14 PM EST


When members of the Massachusetts Republican State Committee (MRSC) gathered together on Thursday, January 31, 2013, to elect a new chairman (or chairwoman), most of them had already made up their minds on who they'd elect.

On one side stood Quincy City Councilor Kirsten Hughes, the perceived "establishment" candidate who was the former deputy finance chairwoman for the equally former US Senator Scott Brown (R-MA). The longtime Republican activist & lawyer also distinguished herself by doing moonlight work as a singer & once had aspirations of being an actress.

On the other side stood State Committeeman Rick Green, the perceived anti-establishment candidate from Pepperell whose support cut across all factions within the Bay State Republican Party. The multi-lingual entrepreneur (he speaks German & Mandarin Chinese) was quickly embraced by many self-professed grassroots organizations (such as the Massachusetts Republican Assembly) who yearned for a Republican leader who shared their worldview of politics.

The MRSC took no chances on an unpredictable election that was expected to be close (in sharp contrast to past chairmanship campaigns where the perceived Establishment candidate usually won against token opposition). The meeting was held inside the swank Apollo Ballroom of the Verve Crowne Plaza in Natick (MA). Four (4) of Natick's finest were hired by the MRSC to ensure that political passions wouldn't get out of hand to the point where the bad publicity of an intra-party riot would make the "Stupid Party" (Republicans) appear even more stupid in the eyes of the public.

The Angelic One :: A "Once In A Generation Event" For The MA GOP
A half dozen young people stood in the cold holding red, white & blue Hughes signs (notable for being minimalistic in its design) outside the hotel's front entrance while another half dozen (somewhat older) folks holding bold, Celtic-colored "I'm With Grassroots Green For Chairman" signs greeted guests as they ventured into the hotels' main lobby. Both candidates held pre-election soirees. The one thrown by Hughes was located near the front of the front lobby while Green's open-bar festivities were tucked away in a room adjacent to the Apollo Ballroom. Anyone not on the Green guest list (such as yours truly) was denied entrance into the room by Green supporters stationed at the door.

All 80 MRSC members checked themselves in at a table placed before the ballroom entrance where they picked up their name tags. Each member also received a small boxed gift provided to them by Republican National Committeeman Ron Kaufman who, along with Republican National Committeewoman Kerry Healey, attended the meeting.

Also in attendance were elected officials such as House of Representatives Minority Leader Brad Jones (R-North Reading), Representatives Don Wong (R-Saugus), F. Jay Barrows (R-Mansfield), George Peterson (R-Grafton), Jim Lyons (R-Andover), Kevin Kuros (R-Uxbridge), Kimberly Ferguson (R-Holden), Paul Frost (R-Auburn), Ryan Fattman (R-Sutton), State Senate Minority leader Bruce Tarr (R-Gloucester), & Senator Bob Hedlund (R-Weymouth). Rounding out the list of notable people were luminaries such as former congressman Peter Torkildsen, Tuesday Associate consultant & Boston Herald Lone Republican columnist Holly Robichaud, Rabid Republican blogger "Iron Mike" Farquhar, Natural Rights & Compact President Rich Howell, Coalition For Marriage & Family director Chanel Prunier, & Massachusetts Family Institute president Kris Mineau. It was standing room only with over 300 people in attendance (most of whom were sequestered inside the roped-off area of the ballroom located at its entrance).

The meeting started 20 minutes late. After the opening prayer and pledge of allegiance, outgoing chairman Robert Maginn gave his farewell speech. Asserting that he wasn't "going to disappear," Maginn announced that he was going to form an issues-oriented super PAC & asked those assembled to "reach out" to him in making the group successful (though he pointedly discouraged "paid staffers" from present & future GOP campaigns to contact his new organization).

The family of the late State Committeeman Bill Nickerson was on hand to receive a five thousand dollar scholarship grant from Maginn on behalf of his charitable foundation. Derek Nickerson briefly spoke on behalf of his family as he thanked Maginn in particular & the committee in general for kindnesses rendered to the Nickerson family following the death of his father. Acting on behalf of the MRSC, Vice-Chairwoman Jeanne Kangas presented to Maginn a silver pewter bowl (made by the Boston Pewter company) & thanked him for his service to the Massachusetts Republican Party.

When it came time to vote in the new chairman, Kangas announced that an agreement had been struck by both Green & Hughes to create a "deputy chair" position for the losing candidate in the hopes to ensure party unity after the election for chairman was over. Kangas pleaded with her fellow members not to allow differences within the party to overshadow those areas of agreement on which they ALL shared common differences with their Democrat rivals.

Paper ballots were used & Maginn stated that the "intent of the voter" would be the fundamental yardstick to be used should any problems arose in tabulating the vote. State Committeewoman Sheila Richardson took the opportunity to thank Maginn for being neutral in the MRSC chairman's race & just as quickly denounced Healey & Kaufman for their respective endorsement of Hughes. The floor was open for new nominations but none were offered. Once the floor was closed to new candidates, the MRSC membership & their guests quickly settled down to hear Green & Hughes speak.

Due to the results of a coin toss, Hughes was the first candidate to speak. State Committeewoman Christine Cedrone gave a nomination speech for Hughes that triggered the first visible wave of anxiety to ripple across the ballroom (as reported by the Boston Globe) that resulted in audible gasps & groans among the guests segregated from the MRSC:

In introducing Hughes, state committeewoman Christine Cedrone emphasized that she is a "lifelong Republican" - a seeming reference to Green, who was previously unenrolled - and said pointedly, "She has also not played dirty in this campaign."

As if to douse any flicker of animosity ignited by Cedrone's comments, Hughes herself thanked Green for the level of energy he brought into the campaign and made it a point to emphasize party unity even if the outcome of the vote went against her. She expressed "disappointment" over the 2012 electoral results & promised to "hit the ground running" for the up-coming special elections. Hughes quickly went over the same bullet points of her plan that were posted on Red Mass Group (RMG). The essential thrust of her speech highlighted her biography in order to leverage her political background as an important asset for the party. She vowed to make the GOP brand "better & stronger".

State Committeeman Lucas Noble used his nomination speech for Green as a personal testament to his candidate's abilities and urged his colleagues to vote for someone who would personify a change in direction for the state GOP.

Green thanked Hughes for her "spirited campaign" and, like Hughes, he echoed the theme of party unity being important for the long-term success of the party. Green saw himself as a transformational change agent & characterized the race for the position of chair as a possible "once in a generation event" with ramifications extending well beyond what would happen in the Apollo Ballroom. He pledged to serve for six (6) years as chairman in order to provide continuity while laying down a foundation for the party that he hoped would be an enduring one. Like Hughes, Green quickly highlighted the main points of his campaign plan. He cited his success as an online entrepreneur (adding that it served as a reflection of his leadership abilities) & he pledged to build upon the technological models utilized by his predecessors. "Massachusetts is a RED state," Green exhorted, adding that the party needed a significant attitude adjustment if it wished to be successful. "If we don't believe (we're a Red State), why should the voters?"

Green's rhetoric on political "change" seemed to have made an impact on his listeners. A majority of the guests roared their approval at his closing remarks & they (along with his MRSC supporters) gave him a standing ovation.

After the speeches were over, State Committee Secretary Angela Davis called in alphabetical order the names of all 80 members. Each member took a ballot, wrote on it, & inserted it into a large cardboard box. Once the voting was over, Torkildsen, State Committee Counsel Vincent DeVito, Representative Fattman (Green's campaign chairman) & State Committeeman Matt Sisk (representing the Hughes camp), went to a separate room to count the vote.

As the votes were being counted, the MRSC went ahead with its usual agenda items. Healey & Kaufman gave to the group a report on the party's national prospects. Healey stated that the Republican Party had to reach out beyond its usual constituencies if it wished to remain a viable political force. She felt the Massachusetts GOP could set an example for the national party to follow & that the national party would put money behind new efforts of outreach. Kaufman predicted the upcoming election cycles would be "great years" for the GOP. He acknowledged that the 2012 results were a blow to Republicans but pointed out that the party had recently emerged from ridding itself of its debt & made tremendous investments in technology that would soon bear significant returns in the up-coming election cycles.

When the ballot counters returned, it was announced that Hughes beat Green by a vote of 39 to 38 with three (3) abstentions. State Committeeman Bill Gillmeister immediately issued a point of order & asked Maginn to confirm if one of the "abstained" ballots had been challenged. Maginn confirmed a challenge had occurred over one ballot that contained the initials "R.G." Given Maginn's earlier assertion about "voter intent," the revelation about the "R.G." vote being rejected caused an audible consternation among the guests observing the proceedings. After a brief tussle, the "R.G." vote was accepted by the MRSC - thus precipitating a tie vote. Another round of voting then ensued.

At this point it should be noted that State Committeeman Brock Cordeiro posted an update on the controversy by stating that there were, in fact, no abstentions. State Committeewoman Patricia Doherty went into great detail about the second round of voting & there's nothing more for me to add to her excellent account of the situation.

When it was announced that the second round of voting produced a win for Hughes (41 to 39), Green made the announcement himself as a way to facilitate party unity. But some of his state committee supporters refused to rise to their feet to give Hughes a standing ovation despite Green's obvious pleading for them to do so. Cries of acrimony filled the air as people quickly left the ballroom once the result of the election was known. The animosity towards the process & the MRSC can be seen in blogs such as the one created by Framingham Republican Town Committee Vice Chairman Nicolas Sanchez as well as angry commentary leavened between video clips of the meeting provided by Da Tech Guy.

Is the anger justifiable? Sure. Key Hughes supporters made some bonehead moves that provided ammunition to those who hold the MRSC in contempt. But from my vantage point, I thought that Hughes & Green were genuine in their desire not to let the passions of their respective campaigns get out of control and impair party unity. I also think the "deputy chair" idea is a good one that - if faithfully undertaken - could result in the kind of symbiotic relationship that will help the GOP re-brand itself. The closeness of the race was made possible by the new blood that was injected into the MRSC during the last US Presidential Primary & that to me portends good things for the party. If the dead weight holdovers from previous eras STILL refuse to adapt to the new political environment unfolding before them, then they should resign or get voted out of office less than four (4) years from now. Hughes & Green have a tremendous opportunity to genuinely transform the party into a viable entity if they take their campaign pledges seriously. Let's pray that they do.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Not so much anger, but determination. (0.00 / 0)
From my conversations with folks, rank and file Republicans see this as an opportunity for Kirsten to stand up to the good ole boy network.

Nonsense went on Kirten's name that was totally unnecessary. I don't believe Kirsten had anything to do with it. But we have to ask why certain people who were supposed to be acting as independent arbiters, attempted to fix the results of the first ballot. And that's the only way to describe it. The Chairman clearly said the intent of the voter shall be the standard when judging a ballot. R.G. was obviously a vote for Green. The fact that there were 2 abstention, also was signal that the two State Committee members weren't happy about going along with the establishment.  They clearly feared the outcome of a second vote. So what do they do? They mysteriously find a ballot with Kirsten's name on the back, after said ballots were unsecured for a significant period of time. ???

DeVito lies about not looking at both sides of the first round of ballots when they were first counted! And anyone who knows the score, knows DeVito's history, knows the stunts he's pulled in the past, knows he can't be trusted.

So where does this leave Kirsten? She's the legitimately elected chair. We need to get behind her. But she's got clouds hanging over head as she starts her tenure.
Let's not forget the royal shaft she got by Mr. Brown and his shenanigans. Truth be told, had he not endorsed her and done all the back arm twisting and threatened not to run if Kirsten didn't win, she might have won on the first ballot by a bigger margin. Then it tops it off by announcing he's not running the day after she's elected. Gee that really works out good for Kirsten and the party. If he didn't want to run, he should have announced weeks ago. Now Kirsten inherits his dung pile.

But she can use all this to turn it around. She can stand up to the good ole boys.  That will bring the party together and get the grassroots believing she's serious about positive change and building from the ground up. The MA-GOP doesn't exist to create candidates that consultants can make money from. We aren't the toy of few elite people with deep pockets who are only concerned with putting more money in those pockets. So I have faith that this screwing Kirsten got from Brown, and the stupidity of the good ole boys to show their corruption in public the way they did Thursday night, will cause Kirsten to declare her independence from these jokers and will really mover the party forward. If she takes this route, people will walk through walls for her.


Boot DeVito (0.00 / 0)
It is the only ay she gains any credibility in my book. I can not see anyone trusting him going forward. I wish I had a video camera on DeVito all night. He was clearly seen shaking his head in opposition to every reasonable parliamentary procedure. What is his agenda? Why is he the one people trust around the votes? He has been known to do unsavory things for Ron Kaufman to ensure things go according to the establishment's wishes.
If Kirsten Hughes wants my support as well as many many other like minded grassroots supporters, the first order of business will be to distance herself, thereby distancing US from characters like Vinny DeCheato

[ Parent ]
Good Points, John (0.00 / 0)
If Hughes & Green genuinely work together to advance the agenda of the Republican grassroots - NOT the agenda of the GOP Establishment - then I think the party's prospects will improve dramatically. But it's not going to be easy. I, too, think that DeVito needs to be booted given the damage he's inflicted upon himself, the MRSC, & the Republican Party as a brand. Hughes & Green need to make a few dramatic gestures as a way to capture the faith & imagination of the grassroots. Terminating DeVito's services would be a first step but a step nonetheless in the right direction.

[ Parent ]
We;ve got a real shot. (0.00 / 0)
While I remain convinced that Brown wanted Hughes elected to take over the party, I do believe Kirsten genuinely wants grow the party.

The question now is: Will she be able to assert her independence?

I say yes she can if she wants to. She'll have the backing of those who voted for Green and probably 1/3 or more of the other S.C. members who are royally pissed at what Brown has done. I heard of at least 1/2 dozen S.C. members who voted for Hughes who were screaming about voting differently after Brown's stunt. And these folks were vocal. So I'm sure there were more than the vocal ones that feel the same way.

Others are ripped because of the pranks pulled with the first ballot.

All these folks are fed up with the good ole boys. They've had it. They've trusted them every time and been burnt.

So Kirsten has a real opportunity to move in new direction. She certainly has the talent. She's got no reason to be loyal to the people that put her in this current unenviable position.

I'm willing to act in faith right now. If we start heading in the right direction, Hughes will have a great tenure. The activists will get behind her and things will get done.

If she doesn't, well folks saw the vote on 31st. In 2009, the non-establishment candidate got 3 votes. In Jan 2011, a non-establishment candidate got 17 votes. A few months later MacNamara got 25 votes. Last Thursday Rick Green got 39 votes and it took two ballots for Kirsten to pull out a win. This is the last gasp of air for the establishment if things don't change, if we don't get reform, if the power-brokers and good ole boys aren't told to sit down and STFU.

And call be an eternal optimist. I think Kirsten can and has every reason to do the right thing.


[ Parent ]
2009 (0.00 / 0)
I'm not taking issue with the overarching of your point as  written above except to question that "in 2009, the non-establishment candidate got 3 votes".

Maybe we're talking about two different things but on January 27, 2009 there were three candidates and here were their vote totals:

Jennifer Nassour - 49
Joe Manzoli - 15
Mike Franco - 2

I suppose if you want to call then State Committeewoman Nassour the "Establishment" candidate you can toss the label around but nobody received 3 votes and there were more than two candidates.  Also, I wouldn't have labeled Manzoli "Establishment" even if the typo of 3 was meant for Franco's 2 votes.

Source - The Angelic One here on RMG the next morning - http://www.redmassgroup.com/di...


[ Parent ]
Definitely boot Devito (0.00 / 0)
As someone who caught Devito on video attempting to affect the results in the nomination caucus during the vote count last fall, I think the first step to recovery for the GOP is to distance itself as far from Devito, and all of his methods, as possible.  I find it insane that the ballots were taken to another room rather than counting them publicly, and on camera.  Based on the previous cheating that has gone on, who in the world thinks a back room counting of ballots is a good idea even if observers are present?  Crazy...
I know that I personally will not consider working with the "establishment GOP" until Devito is gone.  I will continue to support candidates directly with both money and time, but the MassGOP is dead to me until I see strong proof that the establishment cancer has left the party.

Take Direct Action (0.00 / 0)
DeVito will remain where he is as long as he enjoys the confidence the MA Republican establishment. Knock off a few of his State Committee supporters in the next GOP Presidential Primary three years from now & replace them with Republicans who share your worldview - including the removal of DeVito. To sit by the sidelines & watch the "cancer" of the establishment GOP do its thing means that you've decided to act as a passive enabler for said establishment.

[ Parent ]
Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.








Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox