Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
September 2014
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Massachusetts Conservatives Boston Maggie
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Miss Kelly

Mass Video Blogs Catch of the Day Video

Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Left in Lowell
Hester Prynne
Mass Marrier

Non-Partisan Massachusetts Blogs
Preti Minahan
Mass Politics Profs

Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Young Americans for Liberty

Hyper Local
My Dedham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Worcester Herald

Mass. Media
The Lone Republican
Pundit Review
Dan Kennedy
WGBH.org's "The Scrum"
WGBH's Adam Reilly
WGBH's "Beat The Press">
WGBH's "Greater Boston">
David Bernstein at Boston Magazine
NECN's "Broadside: with Jim Braude"

National
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State





Rick joins marriage debate!

by: John Howard

Mon Jan 23, 2012 at 14:21:57 PM EST


Well this is welcome news! I was browsing around on Santorum's website to see how he's positioning himself entering Florida. Guess what is currently at the top of his Issues page? That's right, at the same time as the race enters Florida, Rick Santorum has entered the marriage debate. He apparently paid the $3.58 a month ("the equivalent of a Starbucks latte") to join the blog Richochet and posted a few diaries, starting with a diary on marriage, and even responded to comments (though, like most politicians, in a separate diary, not in the comments). The first paragraph is blockquoted on his own website like so:

We Hold These Truths

The White House recently told the press there couldn't be more difference between my position on gay marriage and President Obama's.

On reflection, I agree.

President Obama's position on marriage is constantly "evolving," as he so often says.  He's not sure what marriage is, or what it should become, and no doubt right now he's consulting highly-paid polling experts to determine how his position - and marriage itself - should morph next.  This should come as no surprise given the President's musings about the other great moral issue of our time, the protection of human life.

Read More ...


He makes a strong principled argument, though it'd be stronger if he pointed out that same-sex marriage means same-sex reproduction rights, which means genetic engineering and government regulation and funding and intrusion on our natural reproductive rights as a man or a woman. But he's still consistent with that truth about marriage, and not oblivious to the long term effects of libertarian attitudes toward sex and marriage.
John Howard :: Rick joins marriage debate!
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Here is an example (0.00 / 0)
Over at the Libertarian Independent Gay Forum, I got into a pretty good discussion with a couple people arguing for gay marriage, who (surprise) both insist on being allowed to attempt to procreate with someone of the same sex and also insist that married couples do not have a right to procreate. Those are incredibly radical and ridiculous positions, completely at odds with the supposed goal of helping families and gay people. They're Transhumanists first and foremost, and don't care about real families at all.




Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox