Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.


Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette





New Massachusetts health care "reform" gets national attention (and not the good kind)

by: TLCWeld

Tue Aug 21, 2012 at 10:35:24 AM EDT


(The reviews are coming in on Jones-Patrick Care and they are not good. - promoted by Rob "EaBo Clipper" Eno)

http://www.forbes.com/sites/sa...

In reality, Patrick's new law will restrict patient access to vital medical treatments and squeeze a hospital system that's already in dire financial straits.

Insurers and large hospitals in Massachusetts will also have to pay $225 million in surcharges over four years, starting in 2013. The measure's backers project savings of $200 billion over 15 years.

Who do those costs get passed on to? Oh yeah, consumers.

Massachusetts State Rep. Steven Levy (R-Marlborough) has noted that the law contains no specifics as to how the savings it mandates will actually come into being. He's also called the gross state product a "random" number with which to straitjacket the healthcare budget.

Healthcare providers that don't hit the government's new annual spending targets will face serious consequences. Two new state agencies - the Health Policy Commission and the Center for Health Information Analysis - have been created to discipline them.

Physicians who fail to reduce costs can be compelled to file "performance improvement plans." These filings are essentially designed to embarrass struggling hospitals. If providers don't adhere to their improvement plans, the agencies can fine them up to $500,000. And there don't appear to be any means for appeal or judicial review of these fines.

There's more. None of it good.

What, if anything, could compel Republicans to support this law? I look forward to any response.

TLCWeld :: New Massachusetts health care "reform" gets national attention (and not the good kind)
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Perhaps we could learn a thing or two from Mexico. (0.00 / 0)
http://www.nature.com/news/mex...

---
"That it ceased to exist, I'll grant you, but whether or not it failed cannot be definitively said." - Metropolitan (1990)


Easy one... (0.00 / 0)
they send 1/4th of their population to the United States for "free" healthcare.

You ever been to a Mexican hospital?  (shudder)

"I acknowledge having racist and classist and sexist feelings of white male superiority." -John Howard


[ Parent ]
I was discussing this recently (0.00 / 0)
If Dr's are going to be rewarded for better outcomes (and not for poorer outcomes)...every new patient that walks through their doors is a potential risk.  Who/What stops docs from taking only cases that appear very straightforward and just turfing anything else to a specialist so they don't have to deal with it?  Sounds like a formula to drive malpractice insurance for specialists even higher than it is now.

And speaking of docs, there is a real shortage of PCP and it's only getting worse in this part of the country.  Makes me wonder if there's no money in being a GP/Family Doc anymore.

Suffering Battered Voter Syndrome since 8/31/1981


Why did Republicans vote for this law (4.00 / 1)
I wondered too.  Just wrote my Salem News column on the subject, so had to do some research. First, not all legislative Republicans voted for it: all the Senators did, but 19 House Republicans did not, and since the others seemed to be following their own leadership, I think we can credit Brad Hill for breaking with the other leaders and encouraging another 18 to follow him and not Brad Jones.
This came out so fast during that last crazy day of the session that there was no chance to analyze it and try to reach normally friendly legislators. So they were on their own.The easy response to it was to say, as some House members did, that they weren't voting for something they had no time to read. In all the chaos, the rest just followed the "experts" on the legislation who told them it was OK.  It is not: basically, we now will have socialized medicine in Massachusetts, once again a "first" to lead the way. But, you will hear that it could have been worse, that some changes were made during conference committee.  I never buy that argument, myself.
So, no Senator will have a 100% rating with CLT this year!  

Let's set the record straight... (5.00 / 1)
With all due respect, Barbara, your presumption is incorrect. The people voting against the legislation were not simply following Brad Hill.  In fact there were seven freshmen who led the way in opposing this government takeover of our healthcare system.  On June 5th when the House initially engrossed the bill, the vote was 148-7 (Adams, Bastien, Fattman, Kuros, Levy, Lombardo, Lyons).

When the final vote on the conference committee report came on July 31st, those opposed numbered 20.  Whether the 13 joining us did so because they recognized the flaws in legislation or were simply taking cover in the fact that we had less than 24 hours to review a 349 page bill, only they can say.  But the initial seven of us were voting our own consciences and leading, not following anyone else.


[ Parent ]
Sorry, you're certainly correct (0.00 / 0)
From what I know of the legislators you noted, you may have inspired Brad Hill to break from the leadership! I usually avoid these internal Republican discussions because of the factions and the super-sensitivity; someone asked a question that implied all Republicans had voted Yes and no one was responding. Next time I'll wait til you do it.

[ Parent ]
HOW could Jones do this? (0.00 / 0)
Had little, now no confidence in our leadership when this is what they produce.  Republican outrage is required and desperately needed.  That AND new leadership in our small but growing representation is blatantly clear.  But another case for Term Limits!

Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.








Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox