Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette




Transcript of Susan Rice on 'Face the Nation' - what they don't talk about...

by: Vote3rdpartynow

Tue Nov 27, 2012 at 14:06:13 PM EST


This link here is to the transcript of Susan Rice's appearance on Face the Nation on September 16th.  5 days after the 9/11 attacks on the embassy in Benghazi.  

In the appearance Rice states:

SUSAN RICE: .....But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy--

SUSAN RICE: --sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that-- in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent.

BOB SCHIEFFER: But you do not agree with him that this was something that had been plotted out several months ago?

SUSAN RICE: We do not-- we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.

So she flat out denies any type of preplanned attack and lays blame squarely on a silly video, which is something she and Barack Obama now deny.

But what most people are missing is the other guest on the show, The President of Libya's National Congress, Yousef Al-Magarief.  Here are his words from moments before Susan Rice's comments:

MOHAMED YOUSEF EL-MAGARIAF: The way these perpetrators acted and moved, I think we-- and they're choosing the specific date for this so-called demonstration, I think we have no-- this leaves us with no doubt that this has preplanned, determined-- predetermined.

BOB SCHIEFFER: And you believe that this was the work of al Qaeda and you believe that it was led by foreigners. Is that-- is that what you are telling us?

MOHAMED YOUSEF EL-MAGARIAF: It was planned-- definitely, it was planned by foreigners, by people who-- who entered the country a few months ago, and they were planning this criminal act since their-- since their arrival.

How embarrassing!  Moments before Susan Rice claims the attacks were because of a video the other guest on the show states emphatically that the attacks were planned months in advance, by foreigners that were known about.

Are we to get the truth of this story from the Libyan officials now?  They are seemingly to be trusted more than the Obama administration!  

Here is the most shameful statement she made that day:

BOB SCHIEFFER: The Romney campaign continues to criticize the administration. Paul Ryan was on the campaign trail yesterday saying that the Obama administration has diminished America's presence overseas and our image, a direct quote, "If we project-- if we project weakness, they come. If we are strong, our adversaries will not test us and our allies will respond to us." What's your response to that?

SUSAN RICE: It's two-fold. First of all, Bob, I think the American people expect in times of challenge overseas for our leaders to be unified and to come together and to be steadfast and steady and calm and responsible and that certainly what President Obama has been. With respect to what I think is a very empty and baseless charge of weakness, let's be plain, I think American people know the record very well. President Obama said when he was running for President that he would refocus our efforts and attentions on al Qaeda. We've decimated al Qaeda. Osama bin Laden is gone. He also said we would end the war in Iraq responsibly. We've done that. He has protected civilians in Libya, and Qaddafi is gone. I serve up at the United Nations and I see every day the difference in how countries around the world view the United States. They view us as a partner. They view us as somebody they want to work with. They view President Obama as somebody they trust. Our standing in the world is much stronger so this charge of weakness is really quite baseless.

Mitt Romney knew more than Susan Rice did!  Mitt Romney knew the facts.  Susan Rice owes Mitt Romney an apology.  Obama did protect citizens in Libya - he just ignored protecting the Ambassador and the 3 other brave Americans sent their on Obama's behalf.   Can we start the impeachment process now?

Vote3rdpartynow :: Transcript of Susan Rice on 'Face the Nation' - what they don't talk about...
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Pace yourself V3PN... (0.00 / 1)
...you have more than four more years of the depilating condition called Obama Derangement Syndrome.  I'm concerned about your health.  Particularly when I know you also have to face six years of dealing with your Warren Derangement Syndrome.  But I do have some good news, both are considered pre-existing conditions and they will be covered under Obamacare.  

Let's talk about this, shall we Simple? (5.00 / 1)
Just to prove its not a form of derangement syndrome.

Susan Rice appears on a Sunday morning talk show.  Her appearance follows that of a Libyan official (President of the Libyan Congress) who states clearly that the attacks in Benghazi were planned ahead of time and he knew who was responsible.  

Moments later Susan Rice denies any terrorist involvement and states emphatically that the attacks were the spontaneous, unplanned result of a video.  Knowing what we know now - the Libyan official had the story right and Susan Rice, and the Obama administtration, had the story wrong.  Either Rice lied or they failed at securing the intelligence that the Libyan official had at the same moment in time.  

Are they stupid or are they liars?  

Help me to understand it any other way?  

What you can NOT say is that they went forward with the info they had at the time as that has been disproven by both Petreuas and the Libyan offical.  

Explain it to me and I will not mention this issue again!

To me, it sounds like the Obama administration has a habit of sending out mixed messages and then when called on them can say they told the truth. 'It was  terrorism, it was a movie review' there we covered all the bases....

We are headed for a 'Fiscal Cliff' and the country just elected a dope whose motto is 'Forward'.  


[ Parent ]
Using the fog of war to call for Impeachment proves your derangement (0.00 / 0)
I echo Tom Ricks that conservatives like you are exploiting a tragedy to score political points.  Provide me with a link that shows Petreuas directly contends that Rice provided information that contradicted unclassified CIA information (not a stories that says "according to sources")

Just days after the attack, Rice told the public what she was provided by unclassified CIA reports.  Have facts from the CIA changed since then?  Yes.

If there were something really here, why did Romney--who had been getting intelligence briefings from the CIA during the campaign--bring this issue up during the final debate, that was dominated by foreign policy issues?  Because there was nothing there.  

V3PN, the election is over.  Obama has proven he is tough on terrorists--not only with Bin Laden, but with the drone strikes that have crippled their network.  I don't don't there were screw ups in Benghazi.  But you want to suggest sinister motivations, without providing a shred of proof.  Just weak innuendo.

And based on weak innuendo, you want to impeach the President of the United States.  That is why I feel you either suffer from Obama Derangement Syndrome or you're unpatriotic.  


[ Parent ]
I ask nicely for you to explain Susan Rice's apparant lies..... (5.00 / 1)
and this is your response?

Did Susan Rice lie or was she ignorant of the facts?  That is a simple question.  It was one or the other!

Forget Tom Ricks.  Forget what Romney did or didn't say in the last debate.  Forget Bin Laden.  Forget everything that is NOT related to my question, please!

The President of the LIbyan Congress, who appeared on the very same show as Susan Rice and just moments before her stated in no uncertain terms that the Benghazi incident was a planned and organized terrorist attack.  We now know this to be true beyond any shadow of a doubt.  So very simply, was Susan Rice ignorant of the facts, or was she told to lie?  Answer that question without trying to talk about somebody else at another time and place.  

It is not often I try and engage you in a real discussion.  Can you answer the question: "Was Susan Rice ignorant of the facts, or did she lie?"...

We are headed for a 'Fiscal Cliff' and the country just elected a dope whose motto is 'Forward'.  


[ Parent ]
Did Susan Rice lie or was she ignorant of the facts....? (0.00 / 0)
...in your world those are the only two possibilities and you won't accept a third possibility...that Rice provided the facts as she was provided by the unclassified CIA reports.  But you don't want to provide that as an option, because it doesn't fit with your deranged view of the Obama administration.  Either that or you are carrying the water for John Kerry, in his quest to become Secretary of State.

Boy, I didn't see that coming.  


[ Parent ]
That is the 'ignorant' option.....You have answered the question...thanks! (5.00 / 1)
She was either ignorant of the facts - or - she lied.  You claim that she went in and presented the facts as she had them.  Those facts were wrong and therefore she was ignorant of the truth.  That is what you said Simple, correct?

Yet, remarkably the man that appeared on the show moments prior to Susan Rice had the facts and details exactly right!  That man, Libyan leader MOHAMED YOUSEF EL-MAGARIAF, the day after Susan Rice was seen spewing her foolishness on the Sunday morning news shows had already rounded up 50 (count them 50!) people involved in the preplanned attacks.  Link here:

Then, 9 days after that (September 25th) President Barack Obama speaks at the United Nations and once again claims that the violence was a result of an anti Muslim video.  

This is not Obama derangement Syndrome.  This is a POTUS and his entire administration caught in a grand fabulous lie!  The CIA knew the truth!  The Libyan President knew the truth and spoke it to Susan Rice on the Sunday talk shows!  Yet, the administration lied to the American people.  

Now that you have admitted she was ignorant, and by extension Obama was ignorant of the truth - why, once they did know the truth, did they still maintain the lie?  

We are headed for a 'Fiscal Cliff' and the country just elected a dope whose motto is 'Forward'.  


[ Parent ]
Thank God YOU know the truth about what happened... (0.00 / 0)
...we can all sleep soundly.  

[ Parent ]
That's how to dodge a question Festus (0.00 / 0)


Molon Labe

[ Parent ]
BS (5.00 / 1)
...she was sent to tell a lie and she told the lie.  It wasn't HER lie, it was OBAMA's lie.

The CIA had the facts.
The Administration had the facts.
The "facts" were REDACTED.
They gave Rice the lie and she ran around telling it.  Why it was HER that was chosen to tell the lie is simple.  The President didn't want to tell it.  Hillary didn't want to tell it.
So they found the willing stooge.

"Fog of war" ddoesn't fly when the facts are in hand BEFORE the lie is told.

....but since you are a known dishonorable liar, it's no surprise that you would defend known dishonorable liars.

"I acknowledge having racist and classist and sexist feelings of white male superiority." -John Howard


[ Parent ]
Isn't she allowed to do that? (0.00 / 0)
If they think it's better for national interests to lie about something, don't they usually lie? Since when is the public entitled to the truth?

[ Parent ]
Great defense (0.00 / 0)
....it's for national security.  They can use that for everything now.

Nobody said Rice COULDN'T tell the lie.
Nobody said the public is entitled to the truth in the face of national security.

This was NEVER a matter of national security.  This was a matter of Presidential campaign security.

Ya simply cannot have Al Qaeda affiliates killing ambassadors while the President is running around with the campaign speech that "Al Qaeda is on the run!!"

...but hey...the very next day, he said it was terrorists....right?

"I acknowledge having racist and classist and sexist feelings of white male superiority." -John Howard


[ Parent ]
How many Obama supporters would have voted for Romney (0.00 / 0)
if they thought Benghazi was a terrorist attack and not just a riot? I just don't see how they could have been worried about any voters switching if they said Al Qaeda had attacked our Libya embassy.

And maybe they thought there was a national interest in using the attack to condemn the video, which certainly WAS causing riots around the globe and those riots could have spread and the video could have caused lasting damage if he hadn't condemned it. Tying it to Benghazi might have been a smart thing to do at the time, when the protests about it were still growing. Or maybe a dumb thing, I don't know. But I do know that they are allowed to lie to us and to the world, even if it helps their campaign.


[ Parent ]
I have no reason to believe (0.00 / 0)
that Susan Rice was telling a lie.  As in...I have no reason to believve that she knew the truth at the time of her telling the lie.

The lie is from the ADMINISTRATION that pushed her out there to tell it.
There is NO WAY that the ADMINISTRATION didn't know what they were peddling was not the truth.

"I acknowledge having racist and classist and sexist feelings of white male superiority." -John Howard


Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.








Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox