Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.


Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette





We're Good At White Papers. The Left Tells A Great Story

by: TLCWeld

Wed Nov 28, 2012 at 11:16:31 AM EST


( - promoted by Rob "EaBo Clipper" Eno)

Keeping with my recent theme of taking back the schools and The Angelic One's culture post, I offer this latest installment.

I've been in advertising for 22 years. I worked for an agency that had a process called Brand Essence. Every agency has something similar, with a different name. What they all boil down to is a process of strategic thinking that marries the Rational with the Emotional.

Case in point: VW was selling less than 50,000 cars in North America in 1995, and was think of pulling out of the market all together. My agency was hired because of our ability to come up with the brand's essence. "On the road of life there are passengers and there are drivers. Drivers wanted."

Affordable German engineering. It was all about moving metal, but it was more because of the story behind the metal. The narrative that connected people to the Rational on an Emotional level. Everything we did was based on this basic storyline. And every story expanded on it. On an emotional level. After 10 years of telling this story sales were over 500,000 annually.

People will not buy products for rational reasons alone. They need an emotional reason to make the purchase. Even for a bar of soap. A brand's essence is that emotional connection, and it is indeed a connection, that makes people feel comfortable with the rational reasons for making the purchase.

How does this apply to votes? Conservatives are great at, and focus solely on, "white papers". The dry, rational reasons of why our policies are better for America. Data, history, circumstances generally prove us correct more often than not. But what we fail to do is make the emotional connection with voters in order to get them to feel comfortable with our "product". In fact, we often do just the opposite. We speak in terms of spreadsheets and balance sheets and raw numbers. We wonder at the "stupidity" of those who can't see what we see.

Progressives, on the other hand, can't really defend their policies on empirical and fiscal levels. So they tell stories, they connect on an emotional level that makes it easier to accept their flawed rationality. They control all major storytelling outlets from news rooms to the TV in the living room to the big screen. From the theater to the galleries. Most importantly in the school room.

We've got to get better at telling the story of why our policies are right. We've got to translate the white papers into a narrative. We've got to connect the Rational with the Emotional.

There are very few Conservatives in this creative world. We need to dedicate ourselves to giving these few more platforms with which to tell our stories. For it is the emotional connection where elections are won and lost.

The following article make this point. It's right on the money.

http://www.nationalreview.com/...

TLCWeld :: We're Good At White Papers. The Left Tells A Great Story
The fact is, it's easier to sell a political narrative to America when it comports with the cultural narrative we see and hear every day.

"The universe is made up of stories, not atoms," the poet Mariel Rukeyser once said. Stories, not facts, are the way people process information. Screenplays, plays, scripts, and stories are packed not with hard data but something more powerful and human: emotional data. That's why we remember stories long after we've forgotten facts. Stories stir our souls.

We've invested billions in our great think tanks but little in the task of translating that work into stories the average American will care about. Yes, we have Fox News and political talk radio - important outlets, but outlets that narrowcast to the conservative base and are driven by politics and opinion, not storytelling.

What we don't have is an alternative to NPR. Or The Daily Show. Or 60 Minutes. Or The Charlie Rose Show. Or Frontline. Or Ken Burns. Content that doesn't scream its politics at the audience but that lures America in with great storylines, not lectures.

We don't respect storytelling. We believe deep down in our hearts that if we just keep pounding away at America with our superior policy positions, and our superior arguments, we'll win - that if we just educate the masses, they'll vote with us.

We forget that most Americans get their education through stories. And most Americans don't connect with the smartest person in the room, even if that person believes in the American experiment and the innate genius of the American people.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Excellent post. We need to move beyond the Limbaugh/Hannity (5.00 / 1)
model. Habeeb and Leven nail it with this passage. The right needs to develop "Content that doesn't scream its politics at the audience but that lures America in with great storylines, not lectures."

"Work is the essence of Man."

All in the eyes of the beholder... (5.00 / 1)
You write, "Data, history, circumstances generally prove us correct more often than not." Really? History proved conservatives "right" by their opposition to civil rights in the 60's (I lump the conservative Dems who switch to the GOP over this issue).  And apparently the GOP love for data only pertains to data that fits their world view.  

I could go on, but your suggestions that Conservatives fail because they are to smart for the average voter and Dems win because we tell better stories is all in the eyes of the beholder.  

In fact, your post is a great example of ignoring the fact that the GOP "brand" is stained from driving us into the worse economic crisis since the great Depression and marched the country into the folly we call the Iraq war.  Yup, those are data points that Americans understand.  


Malarkey, you are full of crap! (5.00 / 1)
History proved conservatives "right" by their opposition to civil rights in the 60's

I could go on

Oh, please do Mr. Malarkey (Malarkey is slang for bullshit, isn't it?)...go on...astonish us with more of your ignorance.

Have you ever even cracked a history book?

Your lies, spin and idiocy come straight from the democrat party....the party who has been running away from its race record for 60 years or more.

the longest filibuster of the 1964 (Civil Rights)act was conducted by a still-sitting senator, Robert C. Byrd, who personally spoke against the legislation for 14 hours and 13 minutes on June 9 & 10, 1964.

http://capitalgainsandgames.co...

In the 26 major civil rights votes after 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 percent of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 percent of the votes.

http://archive.newsmax.com/arc...

http://www.black-and-right.com...

"Gee, I had no idea..."  Simple J. (Festus) Malarkey  


[ Parent ]
Gee, I had no idea... (0.00 / 0)
...that for the last 50 years Republicans have been on the right side of history in fighting for the civil rights of blacks and other minorities.  Obviously blacks are not paying attention to your version of history, given that more than 90% regularly vote against Republican presidential candidates.  I have to stop reading widely recognized books detailing the evolution of civil rights laws in the 50s and 60s and use newsmax for my information.  

[ Parent ]
"Gee, I had no idea... " (0.00 / 0)
That may be the most honest thing you ever posted on RMG.

Nice rebuttal by the way...can't think of anything to say so you post a link to an LBJ ball washing...nice.


"Gee, I had no idea..."  Simple J. (Festus) Malarkey  


[ Parent ]
By the way Festus... (0.00 / 0)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

http://www.nationalreview.com/...

http://www.crisismagazine.com/...

http://spectator.org/archives/...

I'd list some books, but it seems you only read books recommended by Oprah.

"Gee, I had no idea..."  Simple J. (Festus) Malarkey  


[ Parent ]
Keep ignoring... (0.00 / 0)
...my point above regarding the Southern Democrats like Strom Thurmond who bolted the Democratic Party and became Republicans after the Civil Rights vote. Also reactionary Dems like Stennis of Mississippi would be replaced by Republican Senators who continued the fight against civil rights.  You also ignore that during this time, there was a bunch of liberal Republicans like Javits of New York who supported civil rights and would now be tarred and feathered by members of today's Republican party.

You apparently have no concept of party realignment.  And thanks for giving me a belly laugh when you mock a Pulitzer and National Book Award winning...and instead push newmaxs and something called thegatewaypundit.com.  Ya, I'm some fancy elitist who uses reputable sources, instead of searching the internet to find websites that agree with my views.  

So what do these web sites say about why Blacks left the Party of Lincoln and now overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party?  You can't deal with the reality that lies in the answers to that question.  


[ Parent ]
Here's one take why (0.00 / 0)
http://www.nationalreview.com/...

While Republican affiliation was beginning to grow in the South in the late 1930s, the GOP also lost its lock on black voters in the North, among whom the New Deal was extraordinarily popular. By 1940, Democrats for the first time won a majority of black votes in the North. This development was not lost on Lyndon Johnson, who crafted his Great Society with the goal of exploiting widespread dependency for the benefit of the Democratic party.

And he's right. And LBJ achieved his goal. And we're still paying for the consequences. But not as much as Blacks are.

Oh, and defend this, if you can:

Democrats again staged a record-setting filibuster. In both cases, the "master of the Senate" petitioned the northeastern Kennedy liberals to credit him for having seen to the law's passage while at the same time boasting to southern Democrats that he had taken the teeth out of the legislation. Johnson would later explain his thinking thus: "These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days, and that's a problem for us, since they've got something now they never had before: the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this - we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference."


G.O.P. Growth. Opportunity. Prosperity. For all Americans.

Karl (TLC)Weld


[ Parent ]
I'm ignoring your "point" because it is a lie. (0.00 / 0)
I "mock a Pulitzer and National Book Award winning" book because it is simply an LBJ ball washing.  Did you read it?

It's right up there with  "Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream" by Doris Kearns Goodwin...did anyone check to see if she plagiarized anything while she was sleeping with LBJ?

Unlike you Festus, I read both sides of an issue.  I don't simply parrot the Democrat Party line.

Why don't you take some time and read what Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams have to say about LBJ and his "Great Society" and what it did to blacks and black families.

There you will find the reality you think I need.


"Gee, I had no idea..."  Simple J. (Festus) Malarkey  


[ Parent ]
It's demographics, Karl (0.00 / 0)
Karl -

OF course, there is no way to disagree with your premise. But what does it mean and what is the answer?

So in my field, I face a similar problem. The best, most creative technology people are left-of-center-to-liberal. (Many are apolitical but dislike Republicans. Some are Republicans but are politically inactive.) For example, the way the Obama and Romney teams did technology was radically different, and the ORCA fail that made news is but a footnote in what really happened. (I may do a long post on this site about all that.)

So I could say the same thing: We need more creative technology guys to build effective tools to reach voters and promote political ideas - as Obama's people did.

I think you and I are just touching two different parts of the same elephant.

I believe that its the demographics of the Republican party and the corporations that serve them. It isn't a lack of money. Surely, the profits and audience of Fox News and thousands of radio programs and thousands of political books and lots of small films (2016, Atlas Shrugged) and a few big films (Batman: The Dark Night Rises - a billion-dollar die-hard right-wing film where the 1% saves the 99% from itself) added together ...isn't nothing.

The larger issue is that we have ignored and alienated college-educated suburban voters and young, culture-driven-and-culture-driving voters. The suburban types consume and fund culture while the young people create and consume it also. We hold poorly-attended RTC meetings at Applebees or the basement of an empty library handing out pieces of paper to older folks while they are standing around a food truck talking about making a new independent film on their iPhones. Game over, man.

So NPR and PBS's programs flatter and court the support of the suburban, college-educated crowd. (We keep attacking PBS funding for their kids to ensure they never become Republicans.) The Daily Show targets 18-35 year old social moderate/liberals that we don't care about. (Someone tell the RNC there are very, very few socially conservative 25-year-olds.)

But we are at work on our demographic targets: white men without college degrees between the ages of 35 and 55 and all senior citizens. We offer them a great deal.

But with the exception of some religious and home-school communities and religious rock groups and think-tanks (as you say), we don't have a lot of interesting content creation. It's because it is hard to see that market when the powerful right-wing media ecosystem is so dominated by existing players. It's like trying to see the stars when the sun is out. It's there, but not noticeable. (As I have seen, try writing a Republican-oriented book that doesn't work withing existing right-wing media channels. It's a non-starter.)

But there are examples of great storytelling out there. For example, I love to cite Veggie Tales - a wonderful series of character-driven animated stories for children that are absolutely, classically, conservative. Stuff like that exists. And what about fantastic storytelling like the education-reform movie, "Waiting for Superman"? What about the powerful documentary products from Two Million Minutes? So there is conservative storytelling. But it is hard to notice.

However, I think the bigger answer is to figure out how we can create a conservative political message to appeal to young people and college-educated suburbanites. They are big drivers of the culture. If we get enough of them, we will get more "Waiting for Superman" efforts and maybe even a cool political TV show anchored by a right-wing Jon Stewart.


A telling example of a failure in "storytelling"... (0.00 / 0)
...is the "fiscal cliff" "negotiations"...

The fact that Boehner is still calling current tax rates a "tax cut" instead of pointing out that allowing these rates to expire is a Dem "tax increase" shows just how inept the GOP (or at least GOP leadership) really is.

Americans may not vote for a tax cut, but they will rarely vote for a tax increase. Romney failed to get that message across during the election and Boehner is ensuring that the Republicans will be once again on the wrong side of the debate.

"Gee, I had no idea..."  Simple J. (Festus) Malarkey  


Democratic story is Be Nice to Others (5.00 / 1)
Maybe the Dems just have a better story?


I've heard this a lot.... (0.00 / 0)
...but when does the MAGOP start to do it?  And how?  And who pays for it?

I have seen some people do it on YouTube, like Rob Willington but he is only one person.

So Karl, you worked in advertising, why don't you help folks create a new message with viral marketing?

Does it require an agency?

If we do this, it has to be constant and not just during presidential elections.

"Don't let me get away with it. Check me out. Don't be the sucker generation." -Ronald Reagan

www.inBrockton.com



Dave, (0.00 / 0)
I've done work for Richard Tisei, Brett Schetzle and Craig Spadafora. I presented creative ideas to the Baker campaign. I've done work with Rob on his MassConservatives endeavor before Swiftcurrent. I have a whole host of stuff they didn't/wouldn't use.

Here are some samples (not all is very creative, I admit):
https://www.facebook.com/photo...

I have presented many creative ideas and automated template proposals to various EDs at MassGOP from Rob (just before he stepped down) to the present. I've shared these thoughts with edfactor as part of his comprehensive IT overhaul to the state party.

Yes, it does take money. A lot more than I have access to. But it also takes a willing mind to realize how important connecting to people on creative, emotional level is.

Simply pointing out in a direct mail piece how your opponent voted is, in my opinion, a complete waste of money until you give them a reason to consider you. An emotional reason.

G.O.P. Growth. Opportunity. Prosperity. For all Americans.

Karl (TLC)Weld


[ Parent ]
I agree... (0.00 / 0)
...And thanks for the work you've done.

I really liked some of the stuff that Rob did, and if you were behind some of it, I think they were great ideas.

If there could be some kind of media club where we could get people together to share ideas and create more of those home grown YouTube videos and try to get them out there.  A lot of people do it, and they are pretty entertaining, and they get a message out.  And if someone creates something in "xtranormal" or another software package it could be pretty cheap.

I think this post has a lot of potential in it.

It also might helps some of those struggling unemployed media students get their names out.

"Don't let me get away with it. Check me out. Don't be the sucker generation." -Ronald Reagan

www.inBrockton.com



[ Parent ]
oh... (0.00 / 0)
...and sorry if it looked like I was saying you didn't help, I just wanted to know...  You're a great contributer here and I always enjoy your work.

"Don't let me get away with it. Check me out. Don't be the sucker generation." -Ronald Reagan

www.inBrockton.com



[ Parent ]
Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.








Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox