Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.


Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
June 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * * * 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette





#chair: A Census!

by: edfactor

Sun Jan 13, 2013 at 16:26:19 PM EST


[The latest in my series to inject some substance into the campaign. Want to help the grassroots? This is an idea that would help small campaigns all over the state. If all my posts feel overwhelming...good! That's the idea! There are five more articles to go before Jan. 31]

If you've ever worked on a MassGOP state legislative campaign, (I have) then you know that early on, you watch the candidate try to decide some of the campaign strategy by looking at two kinds of data: previous election results in the district, and a list of Republican voters. You wish there was good polling data available that you could use, but it is very rare you'll have that, unless you are a big, wealthy campaign.

The hope is that you will figure out what kinds of candidates did well and where they did well. You will want to know where the turnout was strong. You will also want to see where the Republicans are, who voted, and how often. As for activists, you'll turn to your local RTC, and hope they can help you. (Chances are, they can't do much.)

In terms of campaign issues, most candidates start with strong opinions about only a few things, and some broad principles. There is usually a lot of room for adaptation - especially on local concerns. What else should the candidate run on? They probably aren't sure. (Perhaps an ethnic group has a political itch that no one has tried to scratch. How would you know about it?)

Here are some questions that candidates without a lot of money would love to know:

1. Of the registered Republicans in this district, what statewide and local issues are most important to them?

2. How many Republicans are willing to be involved in a campaign? Where are they? Would they prefer direct mail, phone calls, visits, or online outreach? Are they involved in their RTC? Some other political group? Are they tech-savvy? (i.e. can I just use online stuff or do they really need direct mail?)

3. How do unenrolled voters feel about the issues here? What would they like to see in a Republican candidate?

Yet, unless they are running somewhere that has fantastic RTCs (rare!), they won't know any of this, despite what a huge impact it might have on the success of a campaign.

To solve this problem and improve every small campaign in the state, I propose that we conduct a Census, once every few years. It will cover Republicans and unenrolled voters, though we will not ask them the same things. (Why the unenrolled? Because with only 11%, we need most of them to get to a majority in every race.)

(read more...)

edfactor :: #chair: A Census!
The Census would have the following features and benefits:

FEATURES

1. Get the opinions of registered republicans on party policies and activities  - both for the entire state and in their districts.
2. Gauge the tech-savvy of Republicans to see how much training we need to do and how comfortable they are in using tech to be involved.
3. Find out what unenrolled voters would like the GOP to accomplish if we were in office - especially in the cities and among minority groups.
4. Break down the data by location, age, race, and other characteristics.

BENEFITS

1. Candidates would have the ability to know what kinds of potential activists there are locally, and what they could do to help.
2. By figuring out what Republican issues are most important locally, it is more likely you will be able to fire up and turn out the ones in your district.
3. The polling of unenrolled voters would be immensely useful in finding issues to run on that we might not be thinking about.

HOW TO DO THIS

There are probably two ways to do this:

1. We could be constantly doing this ourselves using direct mail, phone calls, and online tools (something like SurveyMonkey) and gradually add more and more data to a central repository. We could then create software that would analyze that data. Or we could use a software-as-service solution like GoodData (www.gooddata.com). This voter management isn't trivial and I will cover it in a separate post.

2. We could hire a professional polling firm. This would cost more, but at least it would be conducted in a professional way and be more respected. We would still have to take that data and make it available.

ARE THE CANDIDATES TALKING ABOUT THIS?

Well... at least a little. Kirsten Hughes has spoken about reaching out to new demographics and sharing data across campaigns. Rick Green has said repeatedly that we must "listen to voters," especially in the cities.

SUMMARY

The wealthy campaigns are never going to share the data they have gotten because they have paid a lot of money to get it. (Yes, there may be some data-sharing agreements that could be made.) But I believe strongly the state party should invest in a census of Republican and unenrolled voters - tailored to help campaigns - and then make it available to all campaigns and RTCs. Those campaigns could then improve that data, and give it back to the common repository to help others. This gets at the issue of "positive equity" that David and Dean have spoken about. If every campaign took this data, improved it, and gave it back, that would help the local RTCs and future campaigns.  

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

#chair: A Census! | 3 comments
A few points (4.00 / 1)
The MA GOP used to pay for Voter Vault and candidates got free access. In 2010 the Brown campaign, with its plethora of volunteers, did a ton of updating to it so that in the later 2010 campaigns the data was decent and there was a lot of descrptions of indidivdual voters.

In 2012 that (VV) was gone and the door lists I got (as a volunteer on both Brown and Tisei)didn't give me anything beyond a name and registration. Some of our early door to door efforts were to determine the leanings of unenrolled, data that probably was already out there from January 2010. More than half of the unenrolled I talked to always vote the same party, with a majority of that portion being R (though this is a suburban sample).

Where any of that data is now is anyone's guess.

We are going to have to be much much smarter (and more reliant on technology) than the Dems, so I agree 100% with this idea.


Management issues (0.00 / 0)
Data about voters will come from many places. (Campaigns, RTCs, and government). Sharing and managing voter data is such a big deal I am going to do a whole post on that.

What I am asking for here is a campaign-independent set of data that everyone can use, but also one that asks about things that aren't about political preferences.

Among many reasons to do this is that the state party needs some leverage to negotiate data sharing with the campaigns, who often don't want to share data that they have expended a lot of resources to obtain. If we can set up a balanced ecosystem of providers and consumers of voter and volunteer data, everyone will play ball and we will all be better off.  


[ Parent ]
Looking Forward to that Post (0.00 / 0)
Will especially be interested in your thoughts and those of others, on how we encourage real sharing of information amongst campaigns.

Right now we have a situation where the Party's data is, to be kind, weak and the major political leaders did not appear to want to share.

Personally, I think this is the result of the Party being primarily run for the Top of the Ticket for so long that the Party Leaders have forgotten about the importance of the data to helping the farm team.  John Walsh would not put up with campaigns not helping each other up and down ticket, here leadership just shrugs (or is quoted that a yet to materialize race is the only race in town).  


[ Parent ]
#chair: A Census! | 3 comments
Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.








Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox