Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Email Format


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Red Mass Group on Facebook



About Us
FAQ
How To Format Posts
Email Us
RSS Feed
RMG Store
Fair Use Policy
2010 Tag Standards
2010 Candidate Profiles RMG Mobile Site

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
May 2013
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Blog Roll
Mass. Conservatives
Ben Wetmore
Boston Maggie
Conservative's Conscience
The Capitol View Live
Critical Mass
Deval Patrick Watch
FreeRepublic - Massachusetts
Hub Politics
Mass Roots
Miss Kelly
New England Republican
No Looking Backwards
Notes from D.R. Tucker
Peter Porcupine
Save WRKO
Scaling the Hill
South Shore Republican Voice
Worcester Freedom Trail
Moonbats
Blue Mass Group
Berkshires Blog
Chimes at Midnight
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Libertarians
Garrett Quinn
Beacon Hill Institute Blog
Pioneer Institute Blog
Campaign For Liberty
Cato at Liberty
Humble Libertarian
von Mises Blog
Ayn Rand Institue
Young Americans for Liberty
Hyper Local
My Dedham
Dracut Forum
Dracut Musings
Holyoke First
Hub Blog
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
Universal Hub
View From Plymouth Rock
Eric Dahlberg's Blog
Mass. Media
Conservative's Conscience
The Daily Briefing
Keller @ Large Blog
Ken Pittman
The Lone Republican
Political Intelligence
Pundit Review
Talking Politics
Commonwealth Unbound
Dan Kennedy
Greater Boston
Michael Graham
National
73 Wire
Ace of Spades
Big Hollywood
Daily Beast
Daily Kos
Daily Paul
Flynn Files
Hot Air
Little Green Footballs
National Review
Pardon My English
Reason - Hit & Run
Red State
Sudden Stop
Wonkette




Obama proposed Sequestration, and now calls it a 'meat cleaver' approach.

by: Vote3rdpartynow

Thu Feb 21, 2013 at 13:49:04 PM EST


From the White House website in April 2011:

FACT SHEET: The President's Framework for Shared Prosperity and Shared Fiscal Responsibility
The President believes that we need a comprehensive, pro-growth economic strategy that invests in winning the future, lays the foundation for strong private-sector job growth and ensures that shared prosperity will keep the American dream alive for generations to come. A key component of that strategy must be a commitment to fiscal responsibility and to living within our means. Today, the President is laying out a comprehensive, balanced deficit reduction framework to cut spending, bring down our debt and increase confidence in our nation's fiscal strength, while supporting our economic recovery and ensuring we are making the investments we need to win the future.

$4 Trillion in Deficit Reduction: The President is setting a goal of reducing our deficit by $4 trillion in 12 years or less. This deficit reduction would be phased in over time to protect and strengthen our economic recovery and the recovering labor market.

Debt on a Declining Path, Backed Up By An Across the Board "Debt Failsafe" Trigger: The President's framework would require that, by the second half of the decade, our nation's debt is on a declining path as a share of our economy. To enforce this requirement, the President is calling on Congress to enact:

A Debt Failsafe that will trigger across-the-board spending reductions (both in direct spending and spending through the tax code) if, by 2014, the projected ratio of debt-to-GDP is not stabilized and declining toward the end of the decade. Consistent with prior fiscal enforcement triggers put in place by Presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Clinton, the trigger should not apply to Social Security, low-income programs, or Medicare benefits.  (aka Sequestration).

While presenting his case for the debt reduction program, which is what this was all about, he outlined 4 areas of concern that he wanted to tackle. He wanted to drive down government spending, which he has failed to do.  He wanted to overhaul taxes and allow the Bush Era tax cuts to expire, which he did do.  He wanted to control helath care costs, which he has failed to do.  And finally, he wanted to strengthen social security, which today remains as vulnerable as ever.  He failed in all respects except getting taxes on the rich increased.  What a total failure of a President and debt reduction effort.  Yet, he blames Republicans for the mess.

Today, Obama refers to the very Sequestration that HE proposed as a 'meat cleaver' approach to debt reduction.  His effort to stop the program he proposed is being targeted with class warfare once again.

"Would they rather put hundreds of thousands of jobs and our entire economy at risk just to protect a few special interest tax loopholes that benefit only the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations?" Obama asked of the GOP during a White House event.

So he has raised the income tax on rich people, raised the social security tax on rich people, demionized rich people, and now it is somehow the rich that are to blame again - along with the Republicans.  

When will this POS start to take responsibility for his own actions?  When will the MSM start to ask him the tough questions?  

Vote3rdpartynow :: Obama proposed Sequestration, and now calls it a 'meat cleaver' approach.
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Who Won? (0.00 / 0)
That's all you need to know about the MSM.  After complaining about not having any access to Obama while he was on his long golf weekend (and Mich and the girls were skiing in Colorado) and not talking with the MSM , the media was finally granted access after his golf with Tiger a d what did they ask?  About sequestration? nope. About North Korean nuclear tests? Nope. About the terrible weather in the US?  Nope. About skyrocketing gas prices?  Nope. They asked the really BIG question, who won?  The profession of journalism is dying right before our eyes so I have given up hoping that they will do any sort of fact based reporting.

Woodward Op Ed (0.00 / 0)
Bob Woodward wrote a good op-Ed on this yesterday for the Washington Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

Here's the sum of it:

The president and Lew had this wrong. My extensive reporting for my book "The Price of Politics" shows that the automatic spending cuts were initiated by the White House and were the brainchild of Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors - probably the foremost experts on budget issues in the senior ranks of the federal government.



House Vote on Sequestration: 218 Republican Ayes, 0 Dem Ayes (5.00 / 1)
Republicans in the U.S. House own Sequestration.

On July 29, 2011, 218 Republican members of Congress voted Aye on S.667. 0 (as in zero) Democrats voted Aye.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/201...

Now that reality has hit and these same Republicans have to make hard decisions they want to shift the blame. 218 Republican Aye votes (including  Boehner, Paul and Cantor) and only 22 Republicans voted against sequestration but it's all Obama's fault.

And then Senator Scott Brown supported Sequestration. In fact Brown disputed Mitt Romney's claim that sequestration was a mistake. This from NPR:

http://www.npr.org/2012/09/14/...

WELNA: Sequestration would carve 10 percent out of next year's defense budget and another eight percent from other government services, such as Head Start and the federal courts. Earlier this week on NBC's "Meet the Press," GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney blamed both President Obama and GOP lawmakers for the sequestration scheme.

(SOUNDBITE OF TV SHOW, "MEET THE PRESS")

MITT ROMNEY: I thought it was a mistake on the part of the White House to propose it. I think it was a mistake for Republicans to go along with it.

WELNA: One Republican who went along was Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown. He disagrees with Romney that voting for sequestration was a mistake.

SENATOR SCOTT BROWN: What's a mistake is the select committee didn't do their job. That's the mistake.

WELNA: Romney got a similar brush-off from House Speaker John Boehner on the day 13 months ago that Boehner voted for the automatic spending cuts. Asked about Romney's criticism then, that the sequester put defense spending on the table, here's how Boehner responded...

REPRESENTATIVE JOHN BOEHNER: Listen, I've got a big job to do here. Those running for president have their own aspirations.

WELNA: That same day, here's what Boehner told CBS.

(SOUNDBITE OF CBS NEWS BROADCAST)

BOEHNER: When you look at this final agreement that we came to with the White House, you know, I got 98 percent of what I wanted. I'm pretty happy.

Whatever happened to the party of personal responsibility?


Do you actually (0.00 / 0)
read and comprehend what you copy/paste?

What EXACTLY was "roll call 667"?   ...because the Bill passed the House, with sequestration that the WHITE HOUSE WANTED with a passage roll call of a 50/50 split with Democrats (95-95) and a 3:1 split with Republicans (174-66).

Sounds like Democrats weren't "zero voted for it" innocent in passing the sequester that the WHITE HOUSE WANTED....somehow, Republicans got it through the Senate and forced the POTUS to sign it.  Hint:   it was the other way around.  The WH proposed it, suckered Reid to go with it, got the Senate minority to go along with it, and got Bonehead Boehner to go along with it.....with everyone expecting that it would never happen.

You know...like Romney said in the quite YOU quoted...."I thought it was a mistake on the part of the White House to propose it. I think it was a mistake for Republicans to go along with it.

Look to Jack Lew and Gene Sperling as the White House planners. Harry Reid was a willing dupe that went along with it, albeit originally unwillingly.  Boehner went along with it.

....and useful idiots ignore how it happened and look to blame someeone else.....just like they knew you would.  Feel free to ignore the Senate and Executive at-will.

Now about those jobs...

"I acknowledge having racist and classist and sexist feelings of white male superiority." -John Howard


[ Parent ]
Adverstise here for as low as $60 per week.








Local Feeds 

Stat Counter

 
Red Mass Group is owned and operated by Robert Eno. It is not authorized or paid for by any candidate or committee.
HOME
Powered by: SoapBlox